Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30739

in Rock Spring, GeorgiaPopulation 6,746

51.34/ 100

Ranked #14,364 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #233 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #18 of 45 Chattanooga, TN-GA ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

65.9%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.47 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

91.3%

in the top 14.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

Rock Spring, Georgia (ZIP 30739) ranks in the top 45% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,364th) and the top 33% of Georgia (233rd).

continue reading

Several of the strongest readings define how this area looks: childcare lies in the top 11.9% nationally, and homeownership is in the top 14.8% nationally. Home broadband subscription registers in the top 18% nationally. On the other hand, modeled pfas lies in the top 5.7% nationally, modeled humid heat is in the top 16% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water registers in the top 17% nationally. PFOS in drinking water lies in the top 18% nationally, modeled expected annual loss is in the top 20% nationally, and unemployment registers in the top 22% nationally. Modeled short sleep lies in the top 21% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 30707, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chattanooga, TN-GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.1%25.3–31.0
High blood pressure among adults37.3%33.7–41.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.9–9.5
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.9–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.7–9.0
Depression among adults21.3%18.4–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.8–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%35.1–42.7
Obesity among adults37.2%30.9–43.9
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.7%11.3–16.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.9%9.7–14.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.1%74.3–79.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.8%73.4–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%83.6–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.4%60.0–68.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.1%54.7–61.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%68.3–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.0–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.1%13.6–18.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.1%23.1–31.5
Short sleep duration among adults39.4%34.0–45.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.9%17.2–22.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.8–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.8%13.0–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.0%13.1–17.0
Any disability among adults31.1%27.2–35.2
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.6–9.9
Mobility disability among adults14.2%12.2–16.2
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%18.7–25.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.2–16.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.8–12.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.5–13.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.8
Loneliness among adults34.8%30.5–39.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.1–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–646.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)8.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription95.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate91.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households55.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+18.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age44.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$76,600$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$238,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,078$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 1.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.68 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured