Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30734

in Ranger, GeorgiaPopulation 2,803

40.34/ 100

Ranked #26,522 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #563 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

37.9%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

35.7 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

16.2 mi

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

68%

in the top 10.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 12.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US88th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

9.2 mi

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

9.5%

in the top 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US75th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Ranger, Georgia (ZIP 30734), overall, ranks in the bottom 17% nationally (26,522nd) and the bottom 21% of Georgia (563rd).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled tree cover registers in the top 10.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled loneliness settles in the top 9.1% nationally, and fatal road crashes is in the top 9.2% nationally. Distance to an emergency room sits in the top 9.3% nationally, and modeled disaster risk lands in the top 12.5% nationally. Home broadband subscription lies in the bottom 12.9% nationally, and modeled independent living disability stands in the top 12.5% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Slow internet speeds registers in the top 16% nationally.

Defined simply, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. ZIP 30139, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.0%28.9–35.2
High blood pressure among adults42.1%38.3–46.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.6–10.3
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%8.0–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.3%9.8–13.1
Depression among adults24.0%20.8–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.5%13.7–17.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.8%38.0–45.8
Obesity among adults36.5%30.0–43.4
Stroke among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.3%16.2–22.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.7%12.0–17.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.7–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.8%73.6–80.1
Cholesterol screening among adults84.8%82.8–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.7%59.2–68.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.3%55.9–62.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.8%63.5–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.3–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.8%17.6–23.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.4%28.5–38.2
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%30.2–41.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.4%23.0–30.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.7%17.5–21.9
Frequent physical distress among adults18.6%16.4–20.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.5%16.0–20.9
Any disability among adults38.8%34.0–43.4
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.5–10.7
Independent living disability among adults11.8%10.2–13.4
Mobility disability among adults19.7%17.2–22.4
Self-care disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.6
Vision disability among adults7.0%6.1–8.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.0%20.8–27.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.1%15.9–22.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.9%13.9–20.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.0%11.9–16.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.6–11.4
Loneliness among adults37.9%33.3–42.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.9–10.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6434.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)25.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle5.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription77.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate85.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households55.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+23.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age43.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$66,917$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$272,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,354$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 1.4378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.43 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured