Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30746

in Sugar Valley, GeorgiaPopulation 1,483

45.71/ 100

Ranked #21,636 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #395 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

22.3%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.75 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

16.5 mi

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

54.3%

in the top 10.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

64.7%

in the top 12.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

89.8%

in the top 18% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

8.5 mi

in the top 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US76th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Sugar Valley, Georgia (ZIP 30746) sits in the bottom 33% nationally (21,636th) and the bottom 44% of Georgia (395th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: park land sits in the top 6.2% nationally, and civic registers in the top 6.9% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover resides in the top 12.1% nationally. On the other hand, distance to an emergency room lies in the top 9.0% nationally, and fatal road crashes settles in the top 10.5% nationally. Modeled pfas stands in the top 10.8% nationally, and crowded housing is in the top 14.3% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol rests in the top 12.6% nationally. Recreation sits at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 30105, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.3%28.7–36.0
High blood pressure among adults42.4%38.0–46.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Current asthma among adults10.2%8.9–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.7–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%8.8–11.8
Depression among adults22.8%19.2–26.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.3%13.2–17.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.6%37.9–47.0
Obesity among adults35.5%27.9–43.4
Stroke among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.0%12.2–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.3%10.0–14.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.4–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%74.4–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%85.1–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.3%58.9–69.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.1%53.2–60.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.9%62.9–79.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%11.9–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.1%15.1–21.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.8%25.7–35.8
Short sleep duration among adults36.4%29.7–43.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.4%20.1–26.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%15.7–20.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%15.0–19.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.0%13.9–18.1
Any disability among adults35.9%31.2–40.6
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.2–10.5
Independent living disability among adults10.0%8.7–11.4
Mobility disability among adults18.0%15.4–20.7
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.3–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%19.1–26.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.2%12.5–18.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.0%10.8–15.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.9–13.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.1–9.5
Loneliness among adults35.6%30.5–41.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.6–9.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–647.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)13.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription80.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate89.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households58.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+13.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age37.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$81,696$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$238,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,130$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured