Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31816

in Manchester, GeorgiaPopulation 4,824

40.39/ 100

Ranked #26,488 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #562 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #201 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (bottom 2.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Pharmacy access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.2%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.9%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.1%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.4%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.4%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.3%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.2%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

Manchester, Georgia (ZIP 31816), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 17% nationally (26,488th) and the bottom 21% of Georgia (562nd).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: pharmacy resides in the top 3.5% nationally, and grocery is in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 6.3% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled diabetes stands in the top 7.5% nationally, short sleep registers in the top 8.9% nationally, and self-care disability settles in the top 9.1% nationally. Modeled stroke sits in the top 8.9% nationally, independent living disability lies in the top 9.8% nationally, and energy burden rests in the top 7.7% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff resides in the top 10.3% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 30258, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.8%30.3–33.5
High blood pressure among adults45.9%44.0–47.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.9–8.8
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.7–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%8.1–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%9.3–11.3
Depression among adults20.8%19.3–22.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.2%17.1–19.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%38.0–41.9
Obesity among adults42.7%39.4–46.0
Stroke among adults5.4%5.0–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.0%17.6–24.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.6%12.0–15.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.6%80.4–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%79.3–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%85.5–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.8%58.8–68.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.2%46.5–53.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%66.1–80.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.9%10.9–13.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.7%17.0–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.5%32.8–38.3
Short sleep duration among adults42.1%35.2–49.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.1%25.1–29.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.0%17.8–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults17.4%16.2–18.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.3%15.9–18.7
Any disability among adults37.6%35.1–40.1
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.7–8.9
Independent living disability among adults12.3%11.3–13.3
Mobility disability among adults20.6%19.1–22.2
Self-care disability among adults6.4%5.9–6.9
Vision disability among adults8.1%7.5–8.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.9%22.3–29.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.5%21.3–27.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.1%20.1–26.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.8%16.4–21.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.5%11.1–14.2
Loneliness among adults37.4%32.3–42.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.3%11.7–15.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6416.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)11.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)5.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle6.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription89.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate57.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households48.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+18.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age38.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$50,663$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$144,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,016$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.5 yr ± 1.3478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.34 years of 72.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured