Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29142

in Santee, South CarolinaPopulation 4,744

42.05/ 100

Ranked #25,170 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #305 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Diabetes

21.7%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.6%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.68 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

52.3%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

65.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.4%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

24.4%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.0%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.2%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.23 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Santee, South Carolina (ZIP 29142) lands in the bottom 22% nationally (25,170th) and the bottom 27% of South Carolina (305th).

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled diabetes registers in the top 1.9% nationally, and stroke sits in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure rests in the top 1.8% nationally, and fatal road crashes is in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled self-care disability stands in the top 4.4% nationally, mobility disability settles in the top 4.3% nationally, and vision disability lies in the top 6.9% nationally. Better still, grocery resides in the top 0.9% nationally, modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and elder services registers in the top 6.2% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, grocery runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 29030, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 89.4; chronic-disease standing 5.2 (bottom 10%) — 84 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #312 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.4%34.3–40.7
High blood pressure among adults52.3%48.5–55.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.3–10.0
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Depression among adults20.8%17.9–23.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults21.7%19.4–24.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.0%39.1–46.7
Obesity among adults42.9%37.3–48.6
Stroke among adults6.6%6.0–7.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.7%14.8–20.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.8%11.7–16.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.4%83.3–87.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults85.7%83.2–87.9
Cholesterol screening among adults88.7%87.2–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.4%66.1–74.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.4%51.9–58.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.2%70.9–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.0%9.1–13.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.9%14.7–19.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.7%31.2–40.2
Short sleep duration among adults39.0%34.0–44.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.1%25.9–32.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.0–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults17.7%15.7–19.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.5%14.7–18.4
Any disability among adults40.4%36.1–44.6
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.7
Independent living disability among adults12.4%11.0–13.7
Mobility disability among adults24.4%21.7–27.1
Self-care disability among adults7.4%6.7–8.1
Vision disability among adults9.2%8.3–10.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.7%25.4–32.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.9%25.7–32.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.6%18.0–23.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.9%17.6–22.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.5–14.4
Loneliness among adults31.5%27.6–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.3%12.6–15.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–6416.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)13.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)5.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription84.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate84.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households53.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+24.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age42.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$54,028$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$182,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$963$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.8 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 74.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured