Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30511

in Baldwin, GeorgiaPopulation 3,151

44.28/ 100

Ranked #23,141 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #438 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.80%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

18.7%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 11.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

3.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 11.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

64.9%

in the top 12.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

69.8%

in the bottom 13.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Baldwin, Georgia (ZIP 30511) sits in the bottom 28% nationally (23,141st) and the bottom 38% of Georgia (438th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled arsenic lands in the bottom 0.3% nationally, fatal road crashes rests in the bottom 11.3% nationally, and modeled tree cover settles in the top 12.0% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 13.5% nationally, and park land rests in the top 15% nationally. On the other hand, modeled uninsured settles in the top 5.7% nationally, and loneliness lands in the top 10.9% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the top 11.2% nationally, and mammography settles in the bottom 13.2% nationally. Modeled colon screening lands in the bottom 13.4% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 30510, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.8%25.1–30.4
High blood pressure among adults38.0%34.7–41.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.4–8.8
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.2–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%8.0–10.4
Depression among adults22.9%20.1–25.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.6–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.2%35.6–42.6
Obesity among adults35.2%29.2–41.2
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.7%16.8–22.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years18.7%16.3–21.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.8%74.3–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.0%73.0–78.9
Cholesterol screening among adults83.6%81.7–85.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.7%55.3–63.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.6%50.4–56.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.8%62.3–76.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.8–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.1%15.7–20.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.5%27.5–35.8
Short sleep duration among adults36.8%31.3–42.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.3%22.4–28.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%17.1–20.9
Frequent physical distress among adults16.7%15.0–18.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.0%16.0–20.2
Any disability among adults35.8%32.0–40.0
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.5–9.2
Independent living disability among adults10.8%9.5–12.1
Mobility disability among adults16.8%14.8–19.1
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.0%21.1–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.5%17.7–23.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.5%14.0–19.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.5%13.6–17.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Loneliness among adults37.4%33.1–41.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.4–10.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6421.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)20.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)0.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle7.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription87.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate73.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population17.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households55.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+14.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age44.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$88,432$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$224,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,056$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 0.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.87 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured