ZIP code
30458
in Statesboro, GeorgiaPopulation 49,717
49.95/ 100
Ranked #16,320 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)
Ranked #272 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 38%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Loneliness
40.8%
in the top 3.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
3.4%
in the top 3.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
30.2%
in the bottom 3.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
37.2%
in the bottom 4.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST4thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Subsidized affordable housing
490 units
in the top 4.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST96thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
4.3%
in the bottom 4.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
1.3%
in the bottom 7.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST35thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
29.2%
in the top 7.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
14.3%
in the top 7.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the top 7.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›The read
ZIP 30458, one of several in Statesboro, Georgia, by its composite score, sits in the bottom 49% nationally (16,320th) and the top 38% of Georgia (272nd).
The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled high cholesterol lands in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 4.6% nationally. Distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled coronary heart disease settles in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and arsenic sits in the bottom 7.2% nationally. On the other side, modeled loneliness lies in the top 3.0% nationally, slow internet speeds rests in the top 3.4% nationally, and homeownership resides in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Poverty is in the top 7.4% nationally, and modeled transportation lands in the top 7.4% nationally.
Next to the surrounding area, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 30461, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 89%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 91%
14%
Healthcare Access
in the top 0.00%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 52%
11%
Disability
healthier than 46%
7%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 12%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 10%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 15%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 22%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 90%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 90%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 70%
11%
Disability
healthier than 64%
7%
Healthcare Access
in the top 0.00%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 25%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 10%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 3%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 21%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
30415
Georgiashares a border
Score 49.48
Closest healthier
30461
Georgiashares a border
Score 53.61
Similar health profile
78705
Texas97% similar profile
Score 49.15
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 17.5% | 15.4–19.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 31.1% | 27.7–34.6 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 4.6% | 4.2–5.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.9% | 9.6–12.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 4.3% | 3.9–4.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.5% | 4.9–6.1 |
| Depression among adults | 22.3% | 19.1–25.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 9.3% | 8.2–10.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 30.2% | 26.9–33.7 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.2% | 31.8–45.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.6% | 2.5–2.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 14.4% | 11.9–17.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 13.7% | 11.8–15.7 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 66.1% | 63.6–68.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 74.6% | 70.8–78.2 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 77.1% | 74.4–79.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.4% | 60.6–69.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 55.5% | 51.9–59.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 76.0% | 68.7–82.3 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.9% | 13.1–19.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 13.0% | 11.3–14.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 25.4% | 21.6–29.5 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.3% | 32.5–44.1 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 20.3% | 18.0–22.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 22.3% | 20.0–24.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.6% | 11.2–14.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 19.6% | 17.7–21.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 32.5% | 28.6–36.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 5.0% | 4.5–5.6 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.1% | 10.0–12.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 11.0% | 9.7–12.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.8% | 3.5–4.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.2% | 5.6–6.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 26.3% | 22.7–30.1 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 23.3% | 20.4–26.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 20.1% | 17.6–22.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.9% | 15.7–20.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 14.3% | 12.8–16.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 40.8% | 35.6–46.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 12.3% | 10.8–13.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | GA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 29.2% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 13.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 14.6% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 18.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 9.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 12.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 33.6% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 9.1% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 6.8% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707 |
| Broadband subscription | 84.8% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 87.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 34.1% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707 |
| Homeownership rate | 37.2% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 73.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 2.1% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707 |
| Foreign-born population | 4.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 3.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720 |
| Single-parent households | 38.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705 |
| Population 65+ | 8.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720 |
| Median age | 24.0 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 39.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715 |
| Median household income | $52,038 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677 |
| Median home value | $231,300 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666 |
| Median gross rent | $973 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $993 ($694–$1,769) n=627 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | GA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured