Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30170

in Ephesus, GeorgiaPopulation 3,732

50.73/ 100

Ranked #15,229 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #253 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #143 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing-cost burden

8.9%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.7%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

34.8 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

2.8%

in the bottom 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Ephesus, Georgia (ZIP 30170) lands in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,229th) and the top 36% of Georgia (253rd).

continue reading

A number of measures place this area on solid footing: housing-cost burden is in the bottom 8.2% nationally, and modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 10.6% nationally. Modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 15.0% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure registers at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. By contrast, crowded housing rests in the top 9.2% nationally, fatal road crashes stands in the top 9.7% nationally, and modeled humid heat lies in the top 13.8% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands in the top 16% nationally, and modeled loneliness sits in the top 17% nationally. Recreation is at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 30263, about 3.8 miles away, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.4%27.9–33.2
High blood pressure among adults38.9%35.7–42.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.7–10.2
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.3–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.6–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.4–9.4
Depression among adults22.1%19.6–25.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.4%12.0–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.5%37.1–43.9
Obesity among adults33.0%27.8–38.8
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.5%12.2–16.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.0%9.3–12.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%77.2–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%75.1–80.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%85.3–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.3%60.1–68.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.5%56.4–62.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.1%66.8–78.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%13.0–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.0%13.9–18.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.4%23.8–31.2
Short sleep duration among adults34.0%29.3–38.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.6%18.3–23.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.9–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%13.8–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%13.6–16.9
Any disability among adults33.0%29.5–36.7
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.1–8.8
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.2
Mobility disability among adults15.7%14.0–17.7
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.9–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.7%11.8–15.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.3–12.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.5–12.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.7–8.7
Loneliness among adults36.0%32.1–40.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.1–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6417.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)5.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle2.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription88.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate79.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households41.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+14.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age35.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$90,962$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$222,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$973$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.4 yr ± 0.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 76.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured