Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30265

in Newnan, GeorgiaPopulation 39,942

59.81/ 100

Ranked #5,001 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #74 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 10.5%)

Ranked #55 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Physician access

2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

37.5 per million

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.79 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

2.9%

in the top 11.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$108,144

in the top 14.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.9%

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, ZIP 30265, one of several in Newnan, Georgia stands in the top 16% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,001st) and the top 10.5% of Georgia (74th).

continue reading

The bright spots in the data define much of the story here: distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Physicians resides in the top 7.1% nationally, and modeled energy burden stands in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Dental providers sits in the top 11.2% nationally, pharmacy resides in the top 11.9% nationally, and modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 14.3% nationally. On the other side, modeled air-toxics cancer risk sits in the top 8.1% nationally, outer-floodplain exposure resides in the top 11.5% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss stands in the top 12.9% nationally. Slow internet speeds sits in the top 15.0% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 30277, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 12.3; chronic-disease standing 76.0 — 64 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,768 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.8%21.9–27.8
High blood pressure among adults34.8%30.9–38.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.2–8.7
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
Depression among adults19.1%16.2–22.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.0%10.4–13.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%33.5–41.7
Obesity among adults34.6%28.3–41.2
Stroke among adults3.0%2.8–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.7%8.7–13.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.8%8.5–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.1–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%75.1–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%87.0–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.6%64.0–73.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.0%62.7–69.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.8%69.8–83.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.4–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.3%9.8–13.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.5%20.0–27.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.9%30.4–41.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.5%14.5–18.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.8–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.3%10.9–13.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.9–13.8
Any disability among adults27.1%23.6–30.9
Hearing disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Mobility disability among adults11.9%10.4–13.5
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.6%18.5–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.9%10.3–13.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.3–9.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.1–12.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Loneliness among adults34.7%29.9–39.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.8–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–649.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)43.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle3.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription91.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate76.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population7.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households47.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+15.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age39.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$108,144$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$372,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,706$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured