Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

92060

in Palomar Mountain, CaliforniaPopulation 619

55.82/ 100

Ranked #8,492 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #733 of 1,719 California ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #76 of 106 San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$152,852

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Park land

62.5%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

98.4%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.9%

in the bottom 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Palomar Mountain, California (ZIP 92060), in overall standing, comes out in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,492nd) and the top 43% of California (733rd).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: household income sits in the top 3.6% nationally, park land stands in the top 1.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden resides at the national minimum. Homeownership sits at the national maximum, floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum, and home broadband subscription resides in the top 6.8% nationally. Unemployment sits at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Against that, walkability resides in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and modeled disaster risk sits in the top 4.2% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 92061, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%26.5–32.2
High blood pressure among adults37.8%34.9–41.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%9.9–12.3
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.1–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%6.4–10.2
Depression among adults23.2%20.7–26.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%11.0–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.5%37.6–43.6
Obesity among adults27.7%24.3–31.8
Stroke among adults4.1%3.5–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.8%8.0–12.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%4.4–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.1%72.0–78.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.9%74.2–79.6
Cholesterol screening among adults89.0%87.2–90.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.0%59.6–68.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.9%61.0–66.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.9%66.3–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%13.1–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%9.9–16.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.8%18.0–26.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.4%29.0–35.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.3%17.7–25.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.1–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%12.7–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%11.4–16.3
Any disability among adults31.0%26.7–35.6
Hearing disability among adults8.0%6.9–9.3
Independent living disability among adults8.5%6.9–10.2
Mobility disability among adults16.3%13.4–19.5
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.6–5.5
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.3–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.2%21.6–29.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%9.6–16.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.1%10.4–18.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.3–12.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.6–8.5
Loneliness among adults32.6%28.8–36.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.5–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)14.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription98.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population4.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households90.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+46.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age64.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$152,852$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$835,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.1 yr ± 3.1178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.11 years of 83.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured