ZIP code
29510
in Andrews, South CarolinaPopulation 10,545
43.20/ 100
Ranked #24,204 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)
Ranked #282 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (bottom 32%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Arsenic in groundwater
1.0%
in the bottom 2.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST15thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
18.9%
in the top 5.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST74thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Fatal road crashes
46.5 per 100,000 residents per year
in the top 4.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.
A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.
Full methodology ›Elder-services access
0.19 per 1,000 residents
in the top 7.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST94thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Grocery access
0.19 per 1,000 residents
in the top 7.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST86thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
6.4%
in the top 9.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST73rdUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
13.8%
in the top 9.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST78thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Stroke
5.4%
in the top 8.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST69thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
26.5%
in the top 9.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS91stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
26.2%
in the top 9.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST74thUS90thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›The read
On balance, and by the composite measure, Andrews, South Carolina (ZIP 29510) ranks in the bottom 25% nationally (24,204th) and the bottom 32% of South Carolina (282nd).
Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled arsenic stands in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and elder services settles in the top 7.5% nationally. Grocery lies in the top 7.9% nationally. On the other hand, modeled diabetes resides in the top 5.8% nationally, fatal road crashes lands in the top 4.9% nationally, and modeled self-care disability registers in the top 9.1% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff sits in the top 9.2% nationally, modeled stroke rests in the top 8.9% nationally, and poverty is in the top 9.4% nationally. Modeled food insecurity stands in the top 9.6% nationally.
In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 29440, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 93%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 61%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 55%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 45%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 18%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 12%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 32%
11%
Disability
healthier than 16%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 15%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 91%
14%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 50%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 46%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 57%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 35%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 26%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 38%
11%
Disability
healthier than 28%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 20%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Below what income predicts
The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes
Estimated life expectancy is 74.1 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $55,058 predicts 77.7 years — 3.6 years below.
Ranked #4,810 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 93.3 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 18.3 — 75 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #765 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
29440
South Carolinashares a border
Score 49.47
Closest healthier
29431
South Carolinaabout 2.2 mi away
Score 46.67
Similar health profile
27983
North Carolina98% similar profile
Score 40.32
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 31.3% | 28.9–33.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 46.0% | 42.9–48.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.2% | 7.6–8.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.8% | 9.8–11.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.3% | 7.7–9.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.2% | 9.3–11.1 |
| Depression among adults | 22.0% | 19.5–24.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 18.9% | 17.2–20.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 37.9% | 34.9–40.8 |
| Obesity among adults | 40.2% | 35.4–45.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.4% | 5.1–5.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 20.6% | 18.0–23.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 13.6% | 12.0–15.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.6% | 80.8–84.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 82.3% | 80.0–84.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.7% | 85.3–87.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 67.0% | 63.4–70.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 53.3% | 50.5–56.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 76.8% | 71.8–81.0 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.1% | 11.3–15.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 17.6% | 15.8–19.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 32.2% | 28.7–35.6 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 39.0% | 34.9–42.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 26.8% | 24.4–29.2 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.1% | 16.5–19.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 16.8% | 15.3–18.4 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.0% | 15.5–18.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 38.0% | 34.7–41.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.7% | 7.0–8.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.8% | 10.8–12.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 20.9% | 19.0–22.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.4% | 5.9–7.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 8.1% | 7.4–8.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 26.9% | 24.5–29.7 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 26.2% | 23.8–28.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 19.0% | 17.1–20.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 19.3% | 17.5–21.1 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 12.1% | 11.1–13.2 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.2% | 30.0–36.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 13.8% | 12.5–15.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | SC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 26.5% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 19.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 14.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 14.6% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 11.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 10.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 20.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 2.3% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414 |
| Households without a vehicle | 8.2% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410 |
| Broadband subscription | 77.2% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 86.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 29.7% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 23.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410 |
| Homeownership rate | 76.9% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 77.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 4.6% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.9% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 2.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419 |
| Single-parent households | 60.3% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 50.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404 |
| Population 65+ | 17.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419 |
| Median age | 40.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415 |
| Median household income | $55,058 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384 |
| Median home value | $117,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383 |
| Median gross rent | $790 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $950 ($678–$1,545) n=343 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | SC median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 74.1 yr ± 0.61 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 76.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 74.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured