Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29588

in Myrtle Beach, South CarolinaPopulation 52,609

55.05/ 100

Ranked #9,386 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #76 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #7 of 15 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

92.4%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

92.4%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.6 pCi/L

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

60.3 mi

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

0.6 days/year

in the bottom 31% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US31st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 29588, one of several in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, on the composite measure, lands in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,386th) and the top 18% of South Carolina (76th).

continue reading

Where this area does well, the measures make it plain: modeled radon resides in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lies in the top 8.6% nationally. Distance to a community health center settles at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home stands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband is in the top 14.6% nationally. Against that, modeled disaster risk rests in the top 3.8% nationally, and expected annual loss sits in the top 4.0% nationally. PFOA in drinking water registers in the top 7.7% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water lands in the top 7.9% nationally. Floodplain exposure resides in the top 11.6% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 29576, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.7 ± 1.3 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.3 years — 3.4 years above them.

    Ranked #601 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.8%28.5–33.2
High blood pressure among adults38.9%36.1–41.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.6–11.4
Current asthma among adults9.1%8.1–10.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.5–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%7.2–8.9
Depression among adults21.9%19.5–24.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.9–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.0%39.1–45.0
Obesity among adults31.3%27.7–35.2
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.0%10.0–14.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.3%10.7–13.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.3%80.1–84.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%78.9–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%86.2–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.6%67.0–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.4%60.5–66.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.1%71.9–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.8–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%12.5–15.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.5%20.8–26.2
Short sleep duration among adults34.7%31.1–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.3%17.3–21.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%15.2–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.5–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.0%12.6–15.4
Any disability among adults30.4%27.6–33.3
Hearing disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.3–9.0
Mobility disability among adults15.0%13.4–16.6
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.6–4.2
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.0%19.4–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.2–15.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.2–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.9%6.1–7.8
Loneliness among adults29.3%26.1–32.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.8–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–6420.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)7.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription93.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate77.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population7.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households58.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+23.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age45.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$70,739$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$267,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$1,282$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 0.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.66 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured