Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29370

in Mountville, South CarolinaPopulation 542

49.40/ 100

Ranked #17,073 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #163 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #30 of 51 Greenville-Anderson-Greer, SC ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

4.2%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

1.5%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.4%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST46th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

94%

in the top 10.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.9 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 14.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Mountville, South Carolina (ZIP 29370) lands in the bottom 47% nationally (17,073rd) and the top 39% of South Carolina (163rd).

continue reading

Reading across the data, the real pressures come first: PFOA in drinking water rests at the national maximum, PFOS in drinking water registers at the national maximum, and PFAS in drinking water resides at the national maximum. Modeled humid heat settles in the top 12.5% nationally, and walkability is in the bottom 14.3% nationally. More encouragingly, housing-cost burden sits in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and poverty lands in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic stands in the bottom 9.9% nationally, and homeownership rests in the top 10.2% nationally.

Put simply, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. On the overall standing, ZIP 29037, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Greenville-Anderson-Greer, SC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.3%28.9–35.4
High blood pressure among adults42.4%38.4–46.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.9–9.5
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.8–10.2
Depression among adults22.5%19.3–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.3%14.3–18.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%35.8–43.8
Obesity among adults36.8%30.7–42.9
Stroke among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.0%12.5–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.7%10.5–15.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.7%79.2–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.6%78.5–84.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.5–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.4%64.8–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.3%56.9–63.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.2%72.0–83.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.4–16.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.2%13.9–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.9%26.5–35.3
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%30.0–40.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.8%21.8–28.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.2–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%13.9–17.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.8%13.9–17.8
Any disability among adults37.1%32.7–41.4
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.5
Independent living disability among adults10.1%9.0–11.4
Mobility disability among adults18.4%16.2–20.9
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Vision disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.7%21.5–28.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.4%17.5–23.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.6–15.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.9%12.7–17.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.5–11.1
Loneliness among adults32.8%28.5–37.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.7–11.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)10.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription81.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)4.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate94.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population3.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households69.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+34.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age51.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$80,104$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.9 yr ± 1.0278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.02 years of 74.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured