Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27924

in Colerain, North CarolinaPopulation 2,708

44.54/ 100

Ranked #22,862 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #593 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.3%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.7%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.1%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.6%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.4%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

21.9%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

4.0%

in the bottom 14.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Colerain, North Carolina (ZIP 27924) lands in the bottom 29% nationally (22,862nd) and the bottom 25% of North Carolina (593rd).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: lead in tap water settles at the national minimum, and modeled binge drinking resides in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Modeled pfas registers in the bottom 8.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled stroke stands in the top 5.3% nationally, high blood pressure lies in the top 4.9% nationally, and diabetes lands in the top 7.8% nationally. Walkability sits in the bottom 8.7% nationally, modeled self-care disability is in the top 9.1% nationally, and modeled mobility disability settles in the top 10.0% nationally.

A note on the terms: lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 27932, about 0.5 miles away, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 98.9 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 10.0 (bottom 10%) — 89 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #151 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.6%30.9–38.3
High blood pressure among adults48.7%44.2–53.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.8–9.7
Current asthma among adults12.2%10.7–13.7
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.2–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%8.9–12.0
Depression among adults22.8%19.4–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.1%15.7–20.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.3%35.7–45.1
Obesity among adults41.3%33.0–50.0
Stroke among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.7%16.3–23.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.3%9.1–13.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.4%79.8–84.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.7%80.5–86.4
Cholesterol screening among adults89.0%87.4–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.1%63.1–72.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.1%54.1–62.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.9%71.6–85.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.3%9.1–13.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.0%14.1–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.0%26.7–37.2
Short sleep duration among adults39.6%32.7–46.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.2%22.4–29.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.1–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%13.8–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%14.5–19.0
Any disability among adults39.8%34.7–44.8
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.8–10.0
Independent living disability among adults11.4%9.8–13.0
Mobility disability among adults21.9%18.9–24.9
Self-care disability among adults6.4%5.6–7.4
Vision disability among adults8.1%7.1–9.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.1%22.1–30.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.8%19.2–26.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.8%17.2–24.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.6%14.1–19.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.8–13.2
Loneliness among adults34.1%28.6–39.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.9%10.2–13.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6414.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)5.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)1.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle1.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription83.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate77.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households44.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+17.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age46.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$72,469$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$137,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$837$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.2 yr ± 1.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.54 years of 79.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured