Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

28452

in Longwood, North CarolinaPopulation 1,152

47.35/ 100

Ranked #19,725 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranked #488 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranked #22 of 28 Wilmington, NC ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Poverty rate

54.4%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

25.5 mi

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

15.5%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.5%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.1%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

41.4%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.5%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.6 pCi/L

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.4%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US15th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Longwood, North Carolina (ZIP 28452) ranks in the bottom 38% nationally (19,725th) and the bottom 38% of North Carolina (488th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles in the top 2.9% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled mammography resides in the top 5.2% nationally, home broadband subscription lands in the top 8.7% nationally, and modeled radon registers in the bottom 1.4% nationally. Against that, poverty sits in the top 1.3% nationally, households without a vehicle rests in the top 6.9% nationally, and crowded housing is in the top 8.2% nationally. Housing-cost burden stands in the top 8.6% nationally. Fiber broadband settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 28469, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Wilmington, NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 98.7 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 24.0 — 75 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #780 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.7%29.1–36.4
High blood pressure among adults43.7%39.2–48.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.1–8.9
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.6–13.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.0–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%7.7–10.7
Depression among adults23.5%19.9–27.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.3%14.0–18.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%33.4–42.2
Obesity among adults40.0%32.7–47.8
Stroke among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.7%11.7–17.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.6%8.4–13.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.3%78.4–83.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.4%80.1–86.2
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.0–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.4%59.2–68.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.3%56.3–64.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.5%74.9–86.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.4%10.0–15.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.7%13.6–20.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.8%23.6–34.3
Short sleep duration among adults40.2%33.6–46.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.9%20.1–27.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.2–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%12.7–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%14.0–19.2
Any disability among adults37.2%32.0–42.5
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.7–8.7
Independent living disability among adults10.4%8.8–12.0
Mobility disability among adults19.1%16.1–22.2
Self-care disability among adults5.7%4.9–6.6
Vision disability among adults7.2%6.2–8.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.0%21.2–28.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.4%17.7–25.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.4%15.9–23.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.3%13.6–19.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.2–12.6
Loneliness among adults33.5%28.3–38.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.9–13.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate54.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6420.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle15.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription97.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate60.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households55.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+3.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age30.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$699$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.9 yr ± 1.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.46 years of 74.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured