Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29307

in Spartanburg, South CarolinaPopulation 19,115

51.66/ 100

Ranked #13,880 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #118 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #9 of 36 Spartanburg, SC ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

78.9%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40.1 per million

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0.000022 ppb

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

US9th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.84 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.8%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 29307, one of several in Spartanburg, South Carolina, on the composite measure, lands in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,880th) and the top 28% of South Carolina (118th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled arsenic lands in the bottom 4.1% nationally, physicians resides in the top 4.8% nationally, and lead in tap water lies in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Elder services settles in the top 9.5% nationally, dental providers stands in the top 9.8% nationally, and modeled mammography is in the top 7.4% nationally. Distance to a nursing home rests at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Working the other way, modeled pfas sits in the top 2.1% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk registers in the top 2.3% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 5.2% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 29346, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Spartanburg, SC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.2 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $65,850 predicts 78.4 years — 1.2 years below.

    Ranked #1,541 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.1 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 77.2 ± 1.1 years.

    Ranked #471 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.1%29.5–34.9
High blood pressure among adults40.8%37.7–44.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.6–11.5
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.5–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%7.0–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%7.2–8.9
Depression among adults23.3%20.6–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.0%12.4–15.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.0%37.8–44.4
Obesity among adults35.7%31.4–40.6
Stroke among adults4.2%3.9–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.6%8.9–12.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.1%9.6–12.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.4%80.3–84.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.2%78.5–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults88.0%86.5–89.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.2%66.4–73.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.4%61.4–67.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.8%75.8–85.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.3–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%10.8–14.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.2%23.1–29.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.4%31.3–39.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.0%17.9–22.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%14.0–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.8–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.8–15.8
Any disability among adults34.4%31.2–37.9
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.4–9.1
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.9–9.7
Mobility disability among adults16.8%15.1–18.7
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.5%5.1–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%20.6–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.0%13.2–17.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.8–10.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.1–13.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.7–8.5
Loneliness among adults31.4%27.7–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–6416.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)11.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)4.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle4.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription88.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate74.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population5.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households50.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+22.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age41.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$65,850$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$221,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$1,093$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.2 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 77.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured