Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29605

in Greenville, South CarolinaPopulation 40,717

51.32/ 100

Ranked #14,389 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #127 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #26 of 51 Greenville-Anderson-Greer, SC ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

698 units

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.8%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.49 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Park land

1.4%

in the top 30% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US70th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 29605, one of several in Greenville, South Carolina sits in the top 45% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,389th) and the top 30% of South Carolina (127th).

continue reading

Reading across the measures, this area's clearest strengths come through: subsidized affordable housing rests in the top 2.8% nationally, physicians sits in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled mammography registers in the top 4.4% nationally. Outpatient lands in the top 8.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center resides at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Lead in tap water lies in the bottom 13.1% nationally. By contrast, modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the top 2.6% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 5.7% nationally. Modeled disaster risk is in the top 9.5% nationally, and expected annual loss rests in the top 11.0% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 29601, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Greenville-Anderson-Greer, SC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 77.9 ± 1.3 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.7%23.4–28.1
High blood pressure among adults39.1%36.2–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.2%6.6–7.9
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.8–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.6–8.0
Depression among adults21.3%18.7–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.7%13.2–16.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.8%32.8–39.0
Obesity among adults36.8%32.5–41.3
Stroke among adults4.1%3.8–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.5%14.9–20.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.5%12.8–16.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%77.6–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%76.7–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.5–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.8%63.7–71.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.7%55.7–61.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.8%76.4–86.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.4–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.6%12.0–15.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.7%24.7–31.0
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%33.0–41.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.9%19.8–24.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.6–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.8–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.3%13.8–16.9
Any disability among adults32.5%29.5–35.7
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.8
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.6–10.5
Mobility disability among adults16.2%14.6–17.9
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.6–5.3
Vision disability among adults6.7%6.2–7.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.3%21.5–27.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.0%20.7–25.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.2%13.6–17.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.5%15.6–19.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.7–12.0
Loneliness among adults32.4%28.7–36.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.8–13.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–6421.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)13.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle6.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription91.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate68.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population9.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households44.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+14.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age35.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$65,648$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$256,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$1,087$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.9 yr ± 0.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.68 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured