Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

28504

in Kinston, North CarolinaPopulation 20,407

42.53/ 100

Ranked #24,797 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #649 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transportation noise

36.8%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

3.9%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

289 units

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

89.8%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

89.8%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.4%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.3%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

3.1%

in the top 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

9.4%

in the top 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 28504, one of several in Kinston, North Carolina ranks in the bottom 23% nationally (24,797th) and the bottom 18% of North Carolina (649th).

continue reading

A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: modeled transportation noise lands in the top 0.9% nationally, and loud transportation noise sits in the top 2.3% nationally. PFOA in drinking water is in the top 8.7% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water settles in the top 9.0% nationally. Modeled stroke resides in the top 8.9% nationally, outer-floodplain exposure registers in the top 11.0% nationally, and unemployment rests in the top 11.0% nationally. On the brighter side, subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 8.5% nationally, modeled binge drinking lies in the bottom 8.5% nationally, and modeled radon lands in the bottom 3.4% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Close by, ZIP 28525, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.1 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $53,583 predicts 77.6 years — 1.5 years below.

    Ranked #1,817 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.5%29.8–37.3
High blood pressure among adults45.5%40.9–50.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–10.0
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.6–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.4–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Depression among adults24.4%20.7–28.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.4%14.3–18.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%34.9–44.2
Obesity among adults40.2%31.9–48.9
Stroke among adults5.4%5.0–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.1%17.5–25.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.2%10.5–14.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%78.0–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.4%79.2–85.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%85.9–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.1%61.0–71.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.8%52.9–60.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%72.3–85.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.3%10.0–15.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.0%15.6–20.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.5%26.7–36.7
Short sleep duration among adults38.4%31.6–45.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.1%23.1–29.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%15.8–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.3–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.7%15.7–19.7
Any disability among adults40.0%35.2–44.8
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
Independent living disability among adults11.4%10.2–12.6
Mobility disability among adults20.9%18.5–23.5
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Vision disability among adults7.8%7.1–8.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.3%20.8–28.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.6%18.9–24.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.1%17.6–22.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.2%14.2–18.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.2%10.0–12.6
Loneliness among adults33.0%28.0–38.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.1–13.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6417.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)15.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)9.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle4.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription86.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate63.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population5.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households49.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+21.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age41.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$53,583$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$143,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$940$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured