Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

28360

in Lumberton, North CarolinaPopulation 12,550

33.91/ 100

Ranked #29,768 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.2%)

Ranked #769 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 3.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

30.7%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.9%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.8%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

47.1%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.1%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

17.1%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.3%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

98.7%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

31.3%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 28360, one of several in Lumberton, North Carolina lands in the bottom 7.2% nationally (29,768th) and the bottom 3.1% of North Carolina (769th).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled tooth loss rests in the top 2.8% nationally, and vision disability stands in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lies in the top 4.5% nationally, and obesity lands in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled self-care disability sits in the top 5.4% nationally, transportation is in the top 4.0% nationally, and cognitive disability settles in the top 5.3% nationally. PFOA in drinking water resides in the top 4.4% nationally, and modeled fair or poor health registers in the top 6.2% nationally. On the better side, lead in tap water rests at the national minimum.

Set beside the nearby areas, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 28358, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $46,598 predicts 77.1 years — 2.7 years below.

    Ranked #3,743 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 80.6; chronic-disease standing 6.9 (bottom 10%) — 74 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #835 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.3%29.3–35.2
High blood pressure among adults44.3%40.6–47.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.9%6.2–7.5
Current asthma among adults13.5%12.0–15.0
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.4–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.2%10.0–12.5
Depression among adults23.1%20.0–26.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.2%16.2–20.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.3%34.6–41.8
Obesity among adults47.1%41.5–52.4
Stroke among adults5.7%5.2–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years30.7%26.3–35.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.1%13.9–18.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%74.8–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%77.7–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%81.7–85.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.3%54.4–63.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.4%46.8–54.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.0%66.8–80.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.9%9.8–14.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.6%20.8–26.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.7%30.4–39.0
Short sleep duration among adults38.8%33.9–44.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.3%28.1–34.5
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%17.9–22.4
Frequent physical distress among adults18.5%16.5–20.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.3%19.1–23.6
Any disability among adults42.6%38.4–46.6
Hearing disability among adults11.0%9.9–12.3
Independent living disability among adults13.8%12.4–15.3
Mobility disability among adults22.5%20.1–24.9
Self-care disability among adults7.1%6.4–7.7
Vision disability among adults10.9%10.0–11.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.1%22.7–29.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults30.1%26.9–33.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults27.9%24.8–31.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.4%18.9–24.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.1%15.4–19.0
Loneliness among adults33.2%29.2–37.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.8%13.9–17.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6423.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)21.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)8.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle5.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription78.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate72.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population4.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households48.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+14.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age38.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$46,598$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$103,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$749$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured