Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27316

in Ramseur, North CarolinaPopulation 7,084

45.14/ 100

Ranked #22,258 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #574 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #32 of 41 Greensboro-High Point, NC ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.15 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.4%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Ramseur, North Carolina (ZIP 27316), overall, ranks in the bottom 31% nationally (22,258th) and the bottom 28% of North Carolina (574th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: mental-health providers registers in the top 6.7% nationally, and modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled radon is in the bottom 13.0% nationally, and outpatient sits in the top 18% nationally. On the other side, crowded housing lands in the top 9.7% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas stands in the top 17% nationally. Physicians rests at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Modeled tooth loss registers in the top 16% nationally.

Defined simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. ZIP 27205, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Greensboro-High Point, NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%27.6–34.6
High blood pressure among adults40.5%36.3–44.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.8
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.8–11.0
Depression among adults26.4%22.6–30.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.4–16.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%34.3–43.3
Obesity among adults40.6%33.1–48.6
Stroke among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.4%16.9–24.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.9%11.9–16.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.5–81.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.3–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%84.2–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.1%60.0–70.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.7%53.8–61.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.8%69.3–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.4–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.3%15.1–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.5%25.0–34.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.1%28.9–41.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.5%21.8–27.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.2–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.8–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.9%16.0–20.1
Any disability among adults38.4%34.0–42.9
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.2–10.4
Independent living disability among adults10.6%9.5–11.8
Mobility disability among adults18.4%16.2–20.7
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Vision disability among adults7.0%6.4–7.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.4–26.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.4%16.9–22.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.7%14.5–19.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.5–16.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.9–11.3
Loneliness among adults33.2%28.2–38.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.3–10.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6413.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)12.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle1.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription86.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate74.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population5.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households50.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+16.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age40.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$56,727$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$160,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$777$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 0.6378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.63 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured