Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27282

in Jamestown, North CarolinaPopulation 15,927

61.68/ 100

Ranked #3,710 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.6%)

Ranked #73 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (top 9.3%)

Ranked #7 of 41 Greensboro-High Point, NC ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

73.8%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

83.2%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0.0006 ppb

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

US10th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97%

in the top 10.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

14.4%

in the bottom 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.5%

in the bottom 10.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Jamestown, North Carolina (ZIP 27282) sits in the top 11.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,710th) and the top 9.3% of North Carolina (73rd).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: modeled mammography registers in the top 2.1% nationally, lead in tap water lands in the bottom 10.0% nationally, and home broadband subscription resides in the top 10.3% nationally. Modeled radon lies in the bottom 4.8% nationally, and fair or poor health settles in the bottom 11.1% nationally. Distance to a nursing home stands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Working the other way, PFOA in drinking water is at the national maximum, and PFOS in drinking water rests at the national maximum. Modeled pfas sits in the top 3.4% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water registers at the national maximum.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 27410, about 0.4 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Greensboro-High Point, NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.3 ± 1.9 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.4 years — 3.9 years above them.

    Ranked #390 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 15.7; chronic-disease standing 75.9 — 60 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,439 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.9%23.9–30.2
High blood pressure among adults35.1%31.3–39.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.8–9.5
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Depression among adults23.6%20.3–27.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%9.2–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.2%32.1–40.3
Obesity among adults33.9%28.2–40.0
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.5%6.0–9.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%6.1–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%75.1–81.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.5%78.2–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults90.1%88.7–91.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.7%64.1–73.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.8%67.5–73.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years83.2%77.3–87.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%11.7–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.2%8.6–11.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.0%16.0–22.5
Short sleep duration among adults31.4%26.6–36.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.4%12.5–16.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.3%12.6–16.2
Frequent physical distress among adults10.9%9.5–12.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.9%10.5–13.4
Any disability among adults28.2%24.7–32.0
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.8–7.4
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Mobility disability among adults11.3%9.9–12.9
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.5–23.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.8–11.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.6–9.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.9–10.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.4–6.9
Loneliness among adults30.3%25.9–34.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–646.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)4.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription97.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate69.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population8.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households55.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+19.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age39.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$91,512$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$312,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$1,364$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.3 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 81.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured