Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

26030

in Beech Bottom, West VirginiaPopulation 443

31.85/ 100

Ranked #30,351 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 5.4%)

Ranked #455 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #30 of 31 Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH ZIPs (bottom 3.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outer-floodplain exposure

12.7%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

54.7%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

63.9%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

15.1%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

47.3%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.4%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST49th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$33,125

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Beech Bottom, West Virginia (ZIP 26030) stands in the bottom 5.4% nationally (30,351st) and the bottom 35% of West Virginia (455th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled disaster risk lands in the bottom 3.2% nationally, and expected annual loss settles in the bottom 4.7% nationally. By contrast, outer-floodplain exposure rests in the top 3.1% nationally, and floodplain exposure lands in the top 3.3% nationally. Home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 3.8% nationally, modeled transportation noise rests in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure settles in the top 7.1% nationally, modeled short sleep rests in the top 8.0% nationally, and household income lands in the bottom 2.7% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 26003, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.8%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.8%36.8–44.5
High blood pressure among adults47.3%42.6–51.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%9.8–12.2
Current asthma among adults12.3%10.7–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults10.2%8.7–11.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.2%10.0–14.5
Depression among adults29.8%25.5–34.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.2%14.7–19.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.9%39.3–48.4
Obesity among adults41.3%33.6–49.4
Stroke among adults5.0%4.2–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.4%18.1–26.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.7%6.6–11.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.7%79.0–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.6%78.2–84.7
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%84.8–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.1%58.8–69.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.4%53.2–61.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.1%65.6–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.1%10.6–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.0%16.4–23.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.0%29.0–41.0
Short sleep duration among adults42.4%35.2–49.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.0%23.5–32.6
Frequent mental distress among adults21.0%18.3–23.7
Frequent physical distress among adults18.8%16.1–21.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.4%16.4–22.5
Any disability among adults42.9%37.3–48.4
Hearing disability among adults10.9%9.3–12.3
Independent living disability among adults12.4%10.3–14.6
Mobility disability among adults22.0%18.2–25.5
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.3–6.2
Vision disability among adults6.7%5.5–8.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%18.5–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.5%13.0–20.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.5%14.7–22.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%9.7–14.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.5–10.7
Loneliness among adults34.0%28.4–39.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.0–12.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–648.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)3.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription63.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate74.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households64.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+25.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age51.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$33,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$60,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$791$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 1.1078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.10 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured