Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

25621

in Gilbert, West VirginiaPopulation 1,739

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

27.87/ 100

Ranked #31,123 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.0%)

Ranked #561 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

46.7%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.95 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

29.3%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

22.2%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.6%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

32%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

82.6%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST49th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.9%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.3%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.3%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Gilbert, West Virginia (ZIP 25621) lands in the bottom 3.0% nationally (31,123rd) and the bottom 20% of West Virginia (561st).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled short sleep sits in the top 1.5% nationally, and tooth loss is in the top 3.6% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability settles in the top 3.6% nationally, and independent living disability resides in the top 5.0% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health registers in the top 5.3% nationally, high cholesterol rests in the top 2.9% nationally, and mobility disability stands in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled diabetes lies in the top 7.2% nationally. On the better side, pharmacy lands in the top 1.2% nationally, and modeled tree cover sits in the top 4.0% nationally.

For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 24851, just across the boundary, ranks better overall. Modeled cognitive disability sits in the top 3.6% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 1.0%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 80.8; chronic-disease standing 2.7 (bottom 10%) — 78 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #591 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults41.3%37.3–45.1
High blood pressure among adults47.7%42.9–52.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.7–10.8
Current asthma among adults13.1%11.5–14.8
Coronary heart disease among adults10.3%9.2–11.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults14.3%12.5–16.3
Depression among adults33.4%28.8–37.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.3%15.9–20.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.9%41.2–50.6
Obesity among adults41.2%33.1–49.4
Stroke among adults5.0%4.5–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years29.3%24.7–34.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.0%8.9–13.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.1–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%76.9–83.9
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.3–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.8%56.5–66.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.3%42.5–50.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.7%62.4–78.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.0%10.6–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.7%22.0–29.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults40.5%35.0–46.1
Short sleep duration among adults46.7%39.8–53.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.0%27.9–36.1
Frequent mental distress among adults23.3%20.6–25.9
Frequent physical distress among adults21.1%18.6–23.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.2%19.4–25.0
Any disability among adults46.7%41.4–51.7
Hearing disability among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Independent living disability among adults13.6%11.9–15.4
Mobility disability among adults23.3%20.4–26.5
Self-care disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.9
Vision disability among adults7.2%6.4–8.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.1%21.1–29.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.1%17.6–25.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.7%19.9–27.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.7%12.4–17.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.2–12.3
Loneliness among adults35.5%30.2–40.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.0–14.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–6414.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)33.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle10.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription90.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)9.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate74.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households69.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+28.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age51.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$51,563$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$85,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$777$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.0 yr ± 1.2078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.20 years of 71.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured