Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

24839

in Hanover, West VirginiaPopulation 495

26.07/ 100

Ranked #31,348 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.3%)

Ranked #589 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

92.4%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

29.8%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

22.8%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

6.2%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

33.1%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.8%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

12.5%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

23.4%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

46.1%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

Hanover, West Virginia (ZIP 24839), overall, ranks in the bottom 2.3% nationally (31,348th) and the bottom 15% of West Virginia (589th).

continue reading

This area's pressures are easy to read across the measures: modeled tooth loss registers in the top 3.3% nationally, cognitive disability resides in the top 2.7% nationally, and energy burden settles in the top 2.3% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health is in the top 4.2% nationally, modeled independent living disability sits in the top 4.5% nationally, and crowded housing lands in the top 3.1% nationally. Households without a vehicle lies in the top 3.6% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol stands in the top 2.6% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled tree cover rests in the top 0.7% nationally, and housing-cost burden registers at the national minimum.

Defined simply, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. ZIP 24822, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 1%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults41.8%37.9–45.8
High blood pressure among adults49.4%45.1–53.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.3–10.4
Current asthma among adults13.1%11.6–14.9
Coronary heart disease among adults10.9%9.4–12.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults14.4%11.9–17.0
Depression among adults32.4%28.2–36.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.0%16.4–21.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.1%41.6–50.7
Obesity among adults45.1%37.3–53.4
Stroke among adults5.1%4.3–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years29.8%25.1–34.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.7%7.9–14.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.4–82.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.3%76.8–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.1–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.3%52.7–63.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.6%43.7–51.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.8%64.6–80.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.0%10.6–15.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults26.2%21.6–30.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults40.2%34.0–46.8
Short sleep duration among adults43.5%36.7–50.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.1%28.2–38.3
Frequent mental distress among adults23.4%20.6–26.5
Frequent physical distress among adults21.2%18.3–24.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.8%19.3–26.4
Any disability among adults47.5%41.6–53.6
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.2–11.9
Independent living disability among adults13.8%11.6–16.2
Mobility disability among adults23.7%20.1–27.5
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.2–7.3
Vision disability among adults7.6%6.4–8.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.3%21.1–29.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.1%17.4–27.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults25.2%20.2–30.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.3%12.3–18.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.5–13.7
Loneliness among adults37.1%31.4–43.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.7%11.4–16.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–645.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)24.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)7.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle23.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription84.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate77.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)12.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households80.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+20.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age56.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$39,355$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$98,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.3 yr ± 2.3378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.33 years of 71.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured