Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

25557

in Ranger, West VirginiaPopulation 1,251

27.87/ 100

Ranked #31,121 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.0%)

Ranked #560 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

94.9%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

29.1%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.9%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

32.3%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.8%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.5%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

46.8%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.1%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.1%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.8%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Ranger, West Virginia (ZIP 25557) sits in the bottom 3.0% nationally (31,121st) and the bottom 20% of West Virginia (560th).

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: modeled tooth loss stands in the top 3.7% nationally, independent living disability resides in the top 4.3% nationally, and fair or poor health sits in the top 5.0% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability stands in the top 4.2% nationally, diabetes resides in the top 4.6% nationally, and obesity sits in the top 2.3% nationally. Modeled short sleep stands in the top 4.4% nationally, and coronary heart disease resides in the top 3.9% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure sits in the top 4.8% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled tree cover stands in the top 0.2% nationally.

A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 25506, just across the boundary. Modeled fair or poor health stands in the top 5.0% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 1%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults43.0%38.9–46.9
High blood pressure among adults48.8%44.3–53.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Current asthma among adults12.9%11.3–14.6
Coronary heart disease among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults14.5%12.9–16.4
Depression among adults32.5%28.1–37.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.5%17.0–22.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.9%39.2–48.6
Obesity among adults46.8%38.9–54.7
Stroke among adults5.4%4.9–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years29.1%24.7–34.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.6%8.6–12.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.7–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.6%78.2–84.8
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%83.8–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.4%59.4–69.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.0%43.9–51.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.7%66.9–81.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.5%10.1–15.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.9%22.7–29.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.3%32.0–42.6
Short sleep duration among adults44.1%37.6–50.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.3%28.5–36.3
Frequent mental distress among adults22.8%20.3–25.3
Frequent physical distress among adults21.3%18.8–23.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.8%19.3–24.4
Any disability among adults45.1%40.1–50.0
Hearing disability among adults11.1%9.9–12.5
Independent living disability among adults13.9%12.3–15.6
Mobility disability among adults23.3%20.3–26.3
Self-care disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.2
Vision disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.9%20.3–27.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.4%18.0–24.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults26.1%22.5–30.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.5%13.2–18.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.7–12.8
Loneliness among adults34.3%29.2–39.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.3%12.4–16.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–6411.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)9.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)1.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)5.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle8.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription87.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate84.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households70.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+21.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age56.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$30,804$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.0 yr ± 1.1378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.13 years of 71.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured