Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

25413

in Bunker Hill, West VirginiaPopulation 9,618

48.72/ 100

Ranked #18,047 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #19 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (top 2.8%)

Ranked #15 of 28 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

60.3%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

305 units

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.8 pCi/L

in the top 14.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.5%

in the bottom 13.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.1%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US15th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

79.2%

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

4.2%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

3.0%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US18th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

6.4%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

3.2%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Bunker Hill, West Virginia (ZIP 25413) ranks in the bottom 44% nationally (18,047th) and the top 2.8% of West Virginia (19th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 8.0% nationally, and modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 13.6% nationally. Modeled energy burden sits in the bottom 15% nationally, and mammography rests in the top 16% nationally. On the other hand, modeled pfas is in the top 7.8% nationally, modeled radon stands in the top 14.9% nationally, and crowded housing settles in the top 18% nationally. Recreation lies at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise resides in the top 18% nationally. Physicians lands at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

In plainer terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 22611, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 99%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.8%27.7–34.0
High blood pressure among adults37.0%33.4–40.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.2–8.8
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.7–13.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.3–8.6
Depression among adults29.7%26.1–33.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.9%10.2–13.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%35.1–42.9
Obesity among adults36.7%31.3–42.8
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.8%11.2–16.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.2–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.8%71.7–77.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.0–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.2–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.2%62.5–71.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.2%54.7–61.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.2%72.9–84.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.9–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%13.4–19.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.6%24.1–33.5
Short sleep duration among adults36.3%31.3–41.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.1%17.1–23.3
Frequent mental distress among adults21.4%18.9–24.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%12.7–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.9%14.6–19.4
Any disability among adults32.7%28.3–37.4
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.6–7.2
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.3–9.8
Mobility disability among adults13.9%11.8–16.1
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%19.9–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.9%10.6–15.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.3–15.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.7–13.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.4–8.6
Loneliness among adults33.4%28.8–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.0–10.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–643.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)12.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)2.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription90.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate85.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population4.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households36.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+11.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age37.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$100,556$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$280,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$1,355$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 2.1178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.11 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured