Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

26543

in Osage, West VirginiaPopulation 0

47.38/ 100

Ranked #19,693 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #31 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (top 4.5%)

Ranked #6 of 22 Morgantown, WV ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loud transportation noise

7.5%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

84.8%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

53.8%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

12.2%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

6.1%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US18th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

49 intersections/sq mi

in the top 20% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US80th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.9%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

Osage, West Virginia (ZIP 26543), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 39% nationally (19,693rd) and the top 4.5% of West Virginia (31st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled loud transportation noise resides in the top 0.6% nationally, colon screening rests in the bottom 4.0% nationally, and transportation noise lies in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff sits in the top 12.6% nationally, and short sleep settles in the top 12.3% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled mammography registers in the top 0.7% nationally, and expected annual loss stands in the bottom 4.4% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lands in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled energy burden resides in the bottom 6.9% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, loud transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 26501, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Morgantown, WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOHPartial

healthier than 81%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOHPartial

healthier than 98%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOHPartial

healthier than 88%

16%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.3%26.9–33.6
High blood pressure among adults37.8%33.7–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.2%6.4–8.0
Current asthma among adults12.7%11.1–14.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.0–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.2–9.1
Depression among adults29.0%25.2–32.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.4–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.6%32.7–40.5
Obesity among adults37.1%31.2–43.1
Stroke among adults3.3%2.8–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.5%11.9–17.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%5.1–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%73.6–79.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%75.9–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%84.6–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years53.8%49.1–58.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.9%61.3–68.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years84.8%79.4–89.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.5–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.2%13.0–21.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.4%21.2–31.5
Short sleep duration among adults41.1%35.9–46.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.1%17.3–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults21.2%18.1–24.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%12.1–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.9%13.8–20.0
Any disability among adults31.1%26.1–36.1
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.3–7.0
Independent living disability among adults9.6%7.8–11.3
Mobility disability among adults14.4%11.9–16.9
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.2–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.1–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%18.9–26.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.6%12.1–19.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.2%13.2–21.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.7%11.0–16.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.5–10.9
Loneliness among adults34.9%30.3–39.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.3–14.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–649.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 1.0678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.06 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured