Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

25214

in Chesapeake, West VirginiaPopulation 994

34.60/ 100

Ranked #29,523 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.0%)

Ranked #347 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranked #35 of 83 Charleston, WV ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

93.3%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

27.9%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.7%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

16.8%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

70%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST16th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

44.9%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST49th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.4%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.4%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US8th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.3%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Chesapeake, West Virginia (ZIP 25214) sits in the bottom 8.0% nationally (29,523rd) and the top 50% of West Virginia (347th).

continue reading

What the numbers press hardest on defines much of the story here: crowded housing stands in the top 0.6% nationally, modeled high blood pressure is in the top 4.9% nationally, and households without a vehicle rests in the top 6.0% nationally. Home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 6.1% nationally, modeled high cholesterol registers in the top 4.6% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability lands in the top 7.8% nationally. Slow internet speeds resides in the top 8.2% nationally. On the encouraging side, modeled tree cover lies in the top 0.5% nationally. Unemployment settles at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss stands in the bottom 8.2% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, crowded housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 25035, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Charleston, WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.6%36.1–42.9
High blood pressure among adults48.7%44.8–52.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.1–11.5
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.4–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults10.3%9.0–11.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.7%9.9–13.8
Depression among adults30.3%26.6–33.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.9%14.6–19.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.9%41.0–48.5
Obesity among adults41.0%35.8–46.1
Stroke among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.8%16.5–23.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.9%6.8–11.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%77.5–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%77.9–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%84.7–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.3%57.4–65.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.0%55.8–62.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.6%66.4–78.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%11.9–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.9%18.8–26.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.7%31.4–41.9
Short sleep duration among adults39.3%35.4–43.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.7%23.7–32.2
Frequent mental distress among adults22.1%19.6–24.7
Frequent physical distress among adults18.7%16.2–21.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.4%17.7–23.6
Any disability among adults44.1%39.1–49.0
Hearing disability among adults10.8%9.4–12.1
Independent living disability among adults12.4%10.6–14.5
Mobility disability among adults21.7%18.6–25.1
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.4–6.0
Vision disability among adults6.5%5.6–7.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.9%22.4–29.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.6%15.2–22.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.8%15.2–22.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.3–16.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.7–10.9
Loneliness among adults35.0%31.0–39.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.2–14.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–643.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)1.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)5.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle16.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription70.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate83.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)27.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households83.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+15.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age46.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$70,956$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.9 yr ± 1.1978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.19 years of 75.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured