Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

25314

in Charleston, West VirginiaPopulation 14,794

57.76/ 100

Ranked #6,598 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #1 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (top 0.2%)

Ranked #1 of 83 Charleston, WV ZIPs (top 1.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

79.4%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST41st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.6%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.0%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

34.8 per million

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.1%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.4%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

3.4 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 12.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.6%

in the bottom 12.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

2.6%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 25314, one of several in Charleston, West Virginia, by its overall standing, sits in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,598th) and the top 0.2% of West Virginia (1st).

continue reading

Several readings land clearly in this area's favor and shape the picture: modeled tree cover lands in the top 5.2% nationally, colon screening is in the top 3.7% nationally, and transportation resides in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Modeled mammography rests in the top 6.4% nationally, modeled food insecurity lies in the bottom 9.2% nationally, and lead in tap water sits in the bottom 10.5% nationally. Fatal road crashes settles in the bottom 12.2% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity registers in the bottom 12.3% nationally. Set against that, modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 4.8% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk lands in the top 9.1% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Locally, no neighbor ranks healthier overall than this ZIP.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Charleston, WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 99%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.8%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.2%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.00%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 99%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.00%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.0 ± 1.3 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.3 years — 3.8 years above them.

    Ranked #435 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.3%30.3–36.4
High blood pressure among adults40.7%37.1–44.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.4–11.4
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.4–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Depression among adults27.2%23.9–30.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.3–13.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.3%38.5–46.0
Obesity among adults34.2%29.5–38.9
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.4%6.2–8.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.5%3.7–5.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%76.8–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.1%80.2–85.6
Cholesterol screening among adults91.4%90.1–92.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.6%71.3–77.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.8%70.2–75.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.1%76.3–85.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%12.7–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.0%9.4–12.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.8%18.7–25.1
Short sleep duration among adults34.8%31.1–38.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.3%13.3–17.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.6–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults11.9%10.5–13.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.8–13.9
Any disability among adults29.1%25.8–32.6
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.7
Independent living disability among adults6.6%5.8–7.5
Mobility disability among adults12.2%10.7–13.9
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.3–2.9
Vision disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.0%17.5–22.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.2–9.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.3–8.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.5–8.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.4–5.7
Loneliness among adults30.2%26.9–33.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–646.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)3.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)63.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription95.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate83.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population5.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households49.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+23.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age43.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$94,556$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$265,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$1,085$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 0.6478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.64 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured