Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

24731

in Kegley, West VirginiaPopulation 175

28.35/ 100

Ranked #31,052 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.2%)

Ranked #552 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

28.6%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

22.6%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

25.2%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.1%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

28.2%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

32.3%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.9%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.3%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

46.5%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

Kegley, West Virginia (ZIP 24731), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 3.2% nationally (31,052nd) and the bottom 21% of West Virginia (552nd).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: modeled tooth loss lands in the top 4.0% nationally, cognitive disability resides in the top 3.0% nationally, and mobility disability lies in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled independent living disability settles in the top 3.9% nationally, homeownership stands in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and modeled fair or poor health is in the top 5.0% nationally. Modeled energy burden rests in the top 3.0% nationally, and short sleep sits in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol registers in the top 2.1% nationally. Better still, home broadband subscription lands at the national maximum.

In everyday language, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 24740, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults44.3%40.4–48.0
High blood pressure among adults47.0%42.6–51.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.3–10.5
Current asthma among adults13.5%11.8–15.3
Coronary heart disease among adults9.6%8.3–11.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults14.7%12.1–17.5
Depression among adults33.3%29.0–37.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.7%16.1–21.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.5%42.3–50.8
Obesity among adults43.5%36.9–50.0
Stroke among adults5.0%4.3–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years28.6%24.3–33.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.0%7.4–13.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.6–83.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.3%78.1–84.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.4%82.8–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.0%57.1–66.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.0%44.4–51.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%67.8–81.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.0%10.6–15.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults26.4%21.7–31.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.8%33.6–46.0
Short sleep duration among adults44.3%38.6–50.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.3%27.2–37.7
Frequent mental distress among adults23.4%20.4–26.5
Frequent physical distress among adults21.2%18.3–24.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.6%19.1–26.5
Any disability among adults46.7%40.7–52.5
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.6–11.3
Independent living disability among adults14.1%11.8–16.7
Mobility disability among adults25.2%21.0–29.5
Self-care disability among adults6.3%5.2–7.7
Vision disability among adults7.7%6.4–9.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.1%20.2–28.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.4%16.9–26.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults26.0%20.8–31.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.2%12.5–18.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.2–13.4
Loneliness among adults36.5%31.4–41.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.2%11.9–16.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)14.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate28.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households27.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age27.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$628$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.6 yr ± 1.0278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.02 years of 73.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured