ZIP code
25204
in Twilight, West VirginiaPopulation 161
21.89/ 100
Ranked #31,753 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.0%)
Ranked #639 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 8.4%)
Ranked #81 of 83 Charleston, WV ZIPs (bottom 2.5%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Independent-living disability
16.3%
in the top 1.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
25.2%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Unemployment rate
48.6%
in the top 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
30.8%
in the bottom 0.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
68.3%
in the top 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
35.4%
in the top 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST89thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
30.3%
in the top 3.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST82ndUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Obesity
49.8%
in the top 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
26.1%
in the top 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
57.7%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›The read
On the composite measure, Twilight, West Virginia (ZIP 25204) stands in the bottom 1.0% nationally (31,753rd) and the bottom 8.4% of West Virginia (639th).
The weightiest signals in the profile are worth naming up front: modeled independent living disability is in the top 1.4% nationally, and cognitive disability registers in the top 1.0% nationally. Unemployment lies in the top 0.3% nationally, and home broadband subscription is in the bottom 0.6% nationally. Poverty registers in the top 0.7% nationally, modeled fair or poor health lies in the top 2.5% nationally, and modeled tooth loss is in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled obesity registers in the top 0.7% nationally, modeled mobility disability lies in the top 2.3% nationally, and housing-cost burden is in the top 1.5% nationally.
Set beside the wider area around it, unemployment runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. ZIP 25093, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Charleston, WV metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 97%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 63%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.8%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 2%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 24%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the bottom 0.8%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Disability
healthier than 2%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 32%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.9%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 13%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 5%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 13%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 10%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Disability
healthier than 10%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 32%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 16%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
in the top 0.00%
14%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 56%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 7%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
in the bottom 0.00%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 5%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 5%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.00%
8%
Disability
healthier than 4%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 11%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
25021
West Virginiashares a border
Score 17.53
Closest healthier
25093
West Virginiashares a border
Score 43.11
Similar health profile
24839
West Virginia100% similar profile
Score 26.07
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 43.2% | 39.4–47.0 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 49.5% | 45.1–53.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.5% | 8.5–10.5 |
| Current asthma among adults | 14.3% | 12.6–16.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.9% | 9.5–12.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 16.2% | 14.0–18.7 |
| Depression among adults | 34.8% | 30.2–39.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 19.7% | 17.2–22.4 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 45.4% | 40.9–49.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 49.8% | 41.9–57.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.5% | 4.9–6.3 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 30.3% | 25.5–35.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 11.1% | 8.5–14.3 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 80.5% | 78.0–82.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 80.7% | 77.1–83.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 83.5% | 80.9–86.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 63.2% | 58.0–68.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 46.3% | 42.2–50.4 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 70.6% | 61.6–78.3 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.2% | 9.9–14.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 27.4% | 23.5–31.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 44.3% | 38.5–50.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 44.8% | 37.9–52.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 35.4% | 30.9–40.1 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 25.8% | 23.0–28.6 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 22.5% | 19.8–25.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 25.2% | 22.1–28.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 49.2% | 43.8–54.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.7% | 9.4–12.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 16.3% | 14.1–18.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 26.1% | 22.7–29.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.9% | 5.9–8.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 8.7% | 7.6–10.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.2% | 21.3–29.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 26.2% | 21.6–30.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 31.7% | 26.6–36.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.3% | 14.5–20.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 13.1% | 11.1–15.3 |
| Loneliness among adults | 35.3% | 30.2–40.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 15.8% | 13.6–18.0 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 68.3% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 12.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 11.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 14.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 48.6% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668 |
| Households without a vehicle | 11.5% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694 |
| Broadband subscription | 30.8% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 57.7% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 16.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694 |
| Homeownership rate | 78.8% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 84.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696 |
| Single-parent households | 0.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 57.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686 |
| Population 65+ | 21.1% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 22.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696 |
| Median age | 56.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 45.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681 |
| Median household income | $13,684 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539 |
| Median home value | $42,400 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $802 ($586–$1,085) n=293 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WV median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured