Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

23696

in Seaford, VirginiaPopulation 3,937

60.95/ 100

Ranked #4,155 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.0%)

Ranked #130 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 14.9%)

Ranked #14 of 123 Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC ZIPs (top 11.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

67.2%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$142,788

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.3%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.3 mi

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.7%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

6.7%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.3%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.8%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

89.9%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Seaford, Virginia (ZIP 23696), in overall standing, comes out in the top 13.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,155th) and the top 14.9% of Virginia (130th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: household income registers in the top 4.8% nationally, lead in tap water is at the national minimum, and modeled food insecurity lies in the bottom 4.7% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity registers in the bottom 5.4% nationally, utility shutoff is in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and transportation lies in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Against that, floodplain exposure registers in the top 1.9% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site is in the bottom 4.8% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure lies in the top 5.6% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water registers in the top 8.9% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 23692, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.5%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.5%25.9–33.3
High blood pressure among adults34.2%30.0–38.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.4–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%4.7–7.2
Depression among adults22.7%19.3–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.2–12.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.4%36.0–44.9
Obesity among adults31.2%24.6–38.8
Stroke among adults3.0%2.6–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.1%6.5–10.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.2–7.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.3%76.0–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%77.5–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults90.0%88.1–91.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.5%68.0–76.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.6%72.7–78.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%70.1–83.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.2–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.6%7.9–13.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.6%14.5–22.9
Short sleep duration among adults30.7%25.2–36.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.5%11.7–17.5
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%12.6–16.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.0%10.0–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.9%9.9–14.1
Any disability among adults27.0%22.4–31.7
Hearing disability among adults6.8%5.9–7.8
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.2–7.5
Mobility disability among adults12.0%9.7–14.4
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.2–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.4%2.9–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.7%14.7–21.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%5.5–9.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.4%3.9–7.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.3–8.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.8%3.9–5.8
Loneliness among adults31.6%26.8–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.4–5.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–641.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)3.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)47.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)0.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription95.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate91.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households64.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+18.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age43.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$142,788$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$427,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$2,241$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 2.1878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.18 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured