Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

23238

in Henrico, VirginiaPopulation 26,050

61.34/ 100

Ranked #3,924 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.3%)

Ranked #126 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 14.5%)

Ranked #16 of 93 Richmond, VA ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

35.8 per million

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.7 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.1%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

24.9%

in the top 13.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 23238, one of several in Henrico, Virginia comes out in the top 12.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,924th) and the top 14.5% of Virginia (126th).

continue reading

The data is generous to this ZIP in several places worth naming: fatal road crashes resides in the bottom 9.4% nationally, modeled energy burden rests in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and modeled colon screening lies in the top 7.0% nationally. Grocery sits in the top 11.4% nationally, lead in tap water settles in the bottom 11.9% nationally, and modeled food insecurity registers in the bottom 12.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home stands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Working the other way, modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 2.9% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk is in the top 8.8% nationally. Floodplain exposure resides in the top 13.2% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, industrial-pollution burden runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 23103, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Richmond, VA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.5 ± 1.0 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.4 years — 2.1 years above them.

    Ranked #1,349 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.3%26.6–32.0
High blood pressure among adults36.7%33.5–40.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.5–11.2
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.5–7.0
Depression among adults21.8%19.1–24.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.2–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%34.6–41.5
Obesity among adults30.4%25.8–35.3
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.7%6.3–9.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.6–7.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.9%77.4–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%78.3–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults89.8%88.5–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.1%69.6–76.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.6%70.0–75.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%74.0–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.7%11.5–16.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.9%8.5–11.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.6%16.9–22.5
Short sleep duration among adults32.4%28.5–36.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.9%14.0–18.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.3%12.8–16.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.8–13.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%10.8–13.6
Any disability among adults29.8%26.7–33.1
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.7–8.3
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Mobility disability among adults13.3%11.8–15.1
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.8–3.4
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.1%15.6–20.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.6–10.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.0–8.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.8–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.9–6.3
Loneliness among adults31.1%27.1–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.5–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–648.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)4.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)55.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription94.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate59.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population9.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households52.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+24.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age43.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$101,523$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$420,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,735$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.5 yr ± 0.4978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.49 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured