Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

23432

in Suffolk, VirginiaPopulation 1,180

54.68/ 100

Ranked #9,855 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #281 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #52 of 123 Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

44.9%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.3%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.2%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

9.6%

in the top 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

25.8%

in the top 12.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

7.9%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US77th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 23432, one of several in Suffolk, Virginia ranks in the top 31% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,855th) and the top 32% of Virginia (281st).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: civic settles in the top 2.5% nationally, and modeled colon screening rests in the top 4.2% nationally. Modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 7.9% nationally, and mammography settles in the top 10.6% nationally. On the other side, distance to a Superfund site rests at the national minimum, modeled high cholesterol lands in the top 4.6% nationally, and unemployment settles in the top 10.4% nationally. Floodplain exposure rests in the top 12.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the top 14.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 23314, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 82.8; chronic-disease standing 22.4 — 60 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,694 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.3%32.6–40.2
High blood pressure among adults43.5%39.1–47.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%8.9–11.0
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%6.8–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.4–9.4
Depression among adults21.7%18.5–25.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.5%13.3–17.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.9%40.3–49.6
Obesity among adults41.0%33.9–48.6
Stroke among adults4.3%3.8–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.8%9.5–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.4–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.8%79.0–84.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.8%79.7–85.6
Cholesterol screening among adults90.2%88.6–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.3%70.3–78.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.9%68.9–74.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.1%73.8–85.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%9.9–14.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.8%10.3–15.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.7%21.2–30.7
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%30.4–41.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.5%16.4–22.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.3–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%12.4–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.4–15.5
Any disability among adults32.7%28.0–37.5
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.7–8.8
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.0–9.6
Mobility disability among adults16.7%14.0–19.5
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.4–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.6%16.4–23.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%9.7–15.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.8%8.4–13.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.2–12.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.8–8.3
Loneliness among adults30.5%25.8–35.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.9–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–6411.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)11.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)9.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle6.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription93.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate90.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households37.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+22.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age55.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$94,306$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$391,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$652$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.8 yr ± 1.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.67 years of 75.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured