Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

23109

in Mathews, VirginiaPopulation 2,327

54.60/ 100

Ranked #9,956 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #284 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #53 of 123 Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

1.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.55 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

9.0%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

13.3%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

17.6 mi

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

13 mi

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.55 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Mathews, Virginia (ZIP 23109) sits in the top 31% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,956th) and the top 33% of Virginia (284th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: grocery stands in the top 0.3% nationally, outpatient resides in the top 0.6% nationally, and pharmacy sits in the top 0.8% nationally. Elder services stands in the top 2.1% nationally, recreation resides in the top 7.1% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits in the top 9.9% nationally. Civic stands in the top 11.0% nationally. Against that, outer-floodplain exposure resides in the top 4.2% nationally, and unemployment sits in the top 5.1% nationally. Distance to a community health center stands in the top 9.8% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 23076, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 95.7 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 25.8 — 70 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,078 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.9%31.2–38.9
High blood pressure among adults41.8%37.4–46.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.8%10.7–12.9
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.8–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.3–9.6
Depression among adults23.2%19.7–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.5–16.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.3%38.6–48.1
Obesity among adults34.4%26.5–42.7
Stroke among adults4.5%4.1–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.6%10.1–15.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%6.0–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.9%80.3–85.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.4%79.2–85.3
Cholesterol screening among adults89.7%88.2–91.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.7%68.1–77.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.1%65.8–72.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.4%72.6–85.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.9%10.5–15.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%10.4–14.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.6%21.2–30.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%26.3–38.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.4%16.7–22.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.4–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.1–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.1–15.6
Any disability among adults35.9%31.3–40.6
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.5
Mobility disability among adults17.8%15.5–20.3
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.7%16.6–23.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.4–12.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.8–9.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.6–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Loneliness among adults31.8%27.0–37.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.4–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–648.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)8.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)13.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle6.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription82.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate77.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households60.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+25.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age44.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$79,196$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$310,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$859$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.2 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 81.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured