Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

22903

in Charlottesville, VirginiaPopulation 40,372

58.17/ 100

Ranked #6,251 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #185 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #15 of 36 Charlottesville, VA ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High blood pressure

25.5%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

30.2%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.0%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

2.1%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

42.2%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.2%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

12.3%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.2%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.9%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 22903, one of several in Charlottesville, Virginia lands in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,251st) and the top 21% of Virginia (185th).

continue reading

The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: modeled high blood pressure lies in the bottom 3.2% nationally, and high cholesterol lands in the bottom 3.6% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease sits in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and stroke is in the bottom 3.5% nationally. Modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Set against that, modeled disaster risk resides in the top 4.1% nationally, slow internet speeds registers in the top 5.5% nationally, and homeownership rests in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Modeled transportation noise stands in the top 6.1% nationally, and loud transportation noise lies in the top 6.3% nationally.

A note on the terms: disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 22901, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Charlottesville, VA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.9 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $69,340 predicts 78.6 years — 2.3 years above.

    Ranked #772 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 34.7; chronic-disease standing 95.5 (top 10%) — 61 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,498 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults17.8%16.1–19.5
High blood pressure among adults25.5%23.1–28.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.3%4.9–5.7
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.7–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults4.0%3.7–4.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Depression among adults25.1%22.2–28.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.0%7.2–8.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.2%27.4–33.1
Obesity among adults30.3%25.3–35.8
Stroke among adults2.2%2.0–2.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.6%8.2–11.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%7.3–9.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure66.5%64.4–68.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.1%72.0–78.1
Cholesterol screening among adults79.1%76.8–81.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.0%66.7–73.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.3%61.6–67.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%74.3–83.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.3–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.4%9.1–11.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.8%18.8–24.8
Short sleep duration among adults34.6%29.9–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.4%14.6–18.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%17.2–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults10.9%9.8–12.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%15.1–18.8
Any disability among adults29.8%26.4–33.0
Hearing disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.7–9.6
Mobility disability among adults9.3%8.3–10.3
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.5–2.9
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.8%18.5–23.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.8%13.9–18.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.7%11.7–15.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.2–13.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.1%9.0–11.5
Loneliness among adults37.5%33.7–41.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.0%7.0–9.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–646.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)5.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)66.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle9.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription89.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate42.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population12.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households40.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+11.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age29.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$69,340$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$526,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,580$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 0.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.70 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured