ZIP code
53726
in Madison, WisconsinPopulation 5,043
62.68/ 100
Ranked #3,142 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.8%)
Ranked #53 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 7.0%)
Ranked #18 of 67 Madison, WI ZIPs (top 27%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High cholesterol
22.6%
in the bottom 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
18.7%
in the bottom 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
22.5%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
58.5%
in the top 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
5.5%
in the bottom 1.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Walkability
230 intersections/sq mi
in the top 1.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Stroke
1.6%
in the bottom 1.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Fatal road crashes
0 per 100,000 residents per year
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.
A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
3.3%
in the bottom 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Transit access
7.2 per 1,000 residents
in the top 2.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›The read
ZIP 53726, one of several in Madison, Wisconsin, in overall standing, comes out in the top 9.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,142nd) and the top 7.0% of Wisconsin (53rd).
A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 1.1% nationally, high blood pressure resides in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and diabetes sits in the bottom 1.4% nationally. Walkability stands in the top 1.7% nationally, modeled stroke resides in the bottom 1.4% nationally, and fatal road crashes sits at the national minimum. Modeled coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 1.8% nationally, and transit resides in the top 2.4% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled binge drinking sits in the top 1.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden stands in the top 1.3% nationally.
Set within its surrounding area, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 53705, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Madison, WI metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 99%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 60%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 82%
11%
Disability
healthier than 92%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 90%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 70%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 40%
14%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 18%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 22%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.2%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 95%
11%
Disability
healthier than 97%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 88%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 83%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 45%
16%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 31%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 2%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 3%
8%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 88%
11%
Disability
healthier than 83%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 97%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 79%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 23%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 20%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 6%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 5%
8%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Heavy environment, light chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 40.6; chronic-disease standing 98.6 (top 10%) — 58 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #15,220 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
53705
Wisconsinshares a border
Score 67.65
Closest healthier
53711
Wisconsinshares a border
Score 65.78
Similar health profile
02457
Massachusetts99% similar profile
Score 68.93
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 12.9% | 11.5–14.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 18.7% | 16.7–20.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 4.6% | 4.2–5.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.2% | 8.9–11.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 3.3% | 2.9–3.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 3.4% | 2.8–4.1 |
| Depression among adults | 27.2% | 23.9–30.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 5.5% | 4.8–6.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 22.6% | 20.3–25.0 |
| Obesity among adults | 29.3% | 25.4–33.5 |
| Stroke among adults | 1.6% | 1.5–1.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 6.2% | 5.0–7.6 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.2% | 4.7–8.8 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 63.5% | 60.6–66.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 69.6% | 66.0–73.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 75.6% | 71.3–78.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 72.3% | 68.7–75.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 66.8% | 63.9–69.6 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 78.0% | 72.4–83.0 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 22.5% | 19.6–25.6 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 7.8% | 6.0–10.1 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 18.4% | 15.2–22.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 27.8% | 24.5–31.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 12.4% | 10.3–15.2 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.3% | 14.6–20.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 9.0% | 7.6–10.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 13.8% | 11.1–17.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 24.7% | 20.8–29.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.2% | 3.6–4.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.3% | 5.9–9.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 6.6% | 5.6–7.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.1% | 1.8–2.5 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.6% | 3.1–4.4 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 17.4% | 14.4–20.8 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.3% | 8.2–15.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 11.1% | 8.0–15.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.2% | 6.2–11.0 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.9% | 6.2–10.5 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.8% | 29.6–38.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.0% | 3.9–6.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 30.6% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 1.9% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.9% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 85.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 3.7% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763 |
| Households without a vehicle | 29.4% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764 |
| Broadband subscription | 90.3% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 58.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764 |
| Homeownership rate | 32.5% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 81.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.9% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764 |
| Foreign-born population | 6.9% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768 |
| Single-parent households | 42.6% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 59.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762 |
| Population 65+ | 8.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768 |
| Median age | 23.6 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 44.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765 |
| Median household income | $47,754 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755 |
| Median home value | $647,300 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755 |
| Median gross rent | $1,364 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $914 ($696–$1,261) n=706 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 85.8 yr ± 2.80 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.80 years of 85.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured