Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

21777

in Point Of Rocks, MarylandPopulation 2,462

62.69/ 100

Ranked #3,134 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.8%)

Ranked #131 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #151 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$159,708

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.3%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

1.5%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

97.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.3%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.8%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.2%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

Point Of Rocks, Maryland (ZIP 21777), in overall standing, comes out in the top 9.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,134th) and the top 29% of Maryland (131st).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: household income sits in the top 3.0% nationally, fatal road crashes stands at the national minimum, and home broadband subscription resides at the national maximum. Modeled mobility disability sits in the bottom 3.8% nationally, poverty stands in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and homeownership resides in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled hearing disability sits in the bottom 5.0% nationally, and independent living disability stands in the bottom 3.6% nationally. Modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 6.2% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 21710, just across the boundary. Beyond that, the ZIP also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.5%22.2–26.7
High blood pressure among adults31.6%28.9–34.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.3–8.9
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults4.5%4.0–5.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%3.8–5.5
Depression among adults21.8%19.3–24.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.3%8.0–10.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%35.5–40.9
Obesity among adults34.5%30.5–38.2
Stroke among adults2.4%2.1–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.3%5.2–7.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%4.8–7.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.1%71.1–76.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%75.5–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults90.6%88.9–92.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.5%64.1–70.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.5%69.1–73.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%68.6–78.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%14.6–19.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.1%7.0–11.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.5%14.6–20.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.2%31.9–38.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.9%10.8–15.2
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.4–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults10.0%8.6–11.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.6%8.9–12.4
Any disability among adults20.5%17.6–23.5
Hearing disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
Independent living disability among adults5.2%4.3–6.1
Mobility disability among adults8.3%6.9–9.8
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.0–2.8
Vision disability among adults2.9%2.5–3.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.9%18.9–25.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.6–10.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.5–7.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.1–10.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.2–6.1
Loneliness among adults31.2%27.9–34.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.6–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–641.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)5.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)44.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle2.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate97.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population6.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households51.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+13.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age43.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$159,708$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$480,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.3 yr ± 1.5778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.57 years of 78.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured