Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

20165

in Sterling, VirginiaPopulation 34,088

69.82/ 100

Ranked #622 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 2.0%)

Ranked #39 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 4.5%)

Ranked #65 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$183,076

in the top 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.2%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.4%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.7%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.2%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.3%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.2%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.8%

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 20165, one of several in Sterling, Virginia, on the composite measure, lands in the top 2.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (622nd) and the top 4.5% of Virginia (39th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: household income lands in the top 1.6% nationally, modeled energy burden resides in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and modeled food insecurity lies in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Modeled transportation settles in the bottom 5.1% nationally, dental providers stands in the top 5.2% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease is in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and stroke sits in the bottom 3.5% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity registers in the bottom 6.0% nationally. Working the other way, distance to a Superfund site lands at the national minimum.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 20147, just across the boundary. Across the board, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.7%19.2–24.5
High blood pressure among adults29.5%26.2–33.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.2%6.5–7.9
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.3–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.7%3.3–4.3
Depression among adults19.7%16.9–22.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.9%7.7–10.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.2%32.6–40.0
Obesity among adults28.6%23.7–34.0
Stroke among adults2.2%2.0–2.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.0%4.0–6.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%5.0–7.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.1%71.7–78.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%75.9–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults90.0%88.5–91.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.8%62.7–71.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults77.0%74.4–79.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.1%71.2–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.3–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.0%6.7–9.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.4%14.6–20.5
Short sleep duration among adults29.5%25.6–34.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.6%10.9–14.4
Frequent mental distress among adults13.3%11.7–15.0
Frequent physical distress among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
Any disability among adults22.3%19.3–25.5
Hearing disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
Independent living disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Mobility disability among adults8.7%7.4–10.0
Self-care disability among adults2.1%1.9–2.3
Vision disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.1%15.4–21.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.2–8.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.0–5.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.8–7.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.1–5.3
Loneliness among adults31.6%27.2–36.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.7–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–645.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)3.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)67.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription98.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate77.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population25.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households45.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+12.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age38.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$183,076$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$704,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$2,531$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.5 yr ± 1.0178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.01 years of 82.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured