Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

21201

in Baltimore, MarylandPopulation 18,307

50.81/ 100

Ranked #15,130 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #382 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #139 of 157 Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD ZIPs (bottom 11.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

2,845 units

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

400 intersections/sq mi

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

5.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

47.8%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

11.0%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.33 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

22.8%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, ZIP 21201, one of several in Baltimore, Maryland lands in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,130th) and the bottom 17% of Maryland (382nd).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 0.2% nationally, and walkability lands in the top 0.3% nationally. Transit registers in the top 0.4% nationally, and outpatient sits in the top 0.8% nationally. Physicians rests in the top 0.9% nationally, mental-health providers is in the top 1.8% nationally, and civic stands in the top 2.1% nationally. Against that, households without a vehicle settles in the top 1.1% nationally, homeownership lies in the bottom 1.5% nationally, and modeled transportation noise resides in the top 2.0% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 21230, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

4 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.3 ± 2.1 years. A median household income of $45,640 predicts 77.0 years — 4.7 years below.

    Ranked #5,441 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.3 ± 2.1 years. The 43 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.8 years — 4.5 years below them.

    Ranked #3,226 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 10.7; chronic-disease standing 66.8 — 56 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,008 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 39.9 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 72.3 ± 2.1 years.

    Ranked #1,408 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.4%19.6–23.3
High blood pressure among adults35.1%32.7–37.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
Current asthma among adults12.4%11.2–13.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%6.4–7.8
Depression among adults24.8%22.2–27.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.6–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.2%29.6–34.8
Obesity among adults36.4%32.6–40.4
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.7%16.1–21.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%8.1–10.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.8%70.7–74.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%75.1–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.1%83.3–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.1%64.5–71.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.7%50.9–56.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%74.2–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.8–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.4%13.6–17.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.8%23.2–28.5
Short sleep duration among adults40.2%36.5–43.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.1%20.1–24.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.1%17.3–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.7–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.5%14.9–18.2
Any disability among adults31.7%28.9–34.6
Hearing disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Independent living disability among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Mobility disability among adults14.9%13.5–16.3
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.9–5.8
Vision disability among adults7.1%6.5–7.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.1%24.2–30.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.4%23.9–29.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults26.5%24.3–28.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.6%19.5–24.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.7–15.7
Loneliness among adults40.9%37.1–44.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.7%14.1–17.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–646.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)8.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)45.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle47.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription82.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)45.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate11.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population12.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households33.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+11.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age33.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$45,640$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$275,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$1,346$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.3 yr ± 1.0778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.07 years of 72.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured