Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55720

in Cloquet, MinnesotaPopulation 17,448

49.88/ 100

Ranked #16,424 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #705 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #54 of 65 Duluth, MN-WI ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.17 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

10.1 days/year

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.91%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

52.4%

in the top 11.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

0.5 mi

in the bottom 29% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US29th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

0.7 days/year

in the bottom 31% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US31st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

9.0%

in the top 32% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US68th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Cloquet, Minnesota (ZIP 55720) lands in the bottom 49% nationally (16,424th) and the bottom 19% of Minnesota (705th).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled expected annual loss lies in the top 2.0% nationally, and disaster risk lands in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled fine-particle sits in the top 9.9% nationally, and pfas is in the top 11.9% nationally. Modeled binge drinking settles in the top 11.2% nationally. On the better side, mental-health providers resides in the top 5.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat rests in the bottom 7.1% nationally, pharmacy stands in the top 10.7% nationally, and outpatient lies in the top 11.4% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 55707, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Duluth, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.2 ± 1.3 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.7 years — 2.5 years below them.

    Ranked #1,921 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.0%22.5–27.4
High blood pressure among adults33.3%30.2–36.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.3–9.8
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.4–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Depression among adults27.3%24.1–30.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.7–13.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.3%30.2–36.5
Obesity among adults39.0%33.9–44.0
Stroke among adults3.7%3.5–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.5%10.4–14.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%7.1–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.6%74.0–78.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.3%70.0–76.3
Cholesterol screening among adults83.6%81.8–85.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.8%65.1–72.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.9%57.9–64.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.2%71.4–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.0%16.4–21.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.4%15.3–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.9%23.5–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults36.3%32.0–40.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.4%17.3–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.3–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.3–15.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.1%13.6–16.7
Any disability among adults33.1%29.8–36.5
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.5–9.1
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.9–9.6
Mobility disability among adults14.8%13.1–16.5
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.6–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%19.2–24.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.1–16.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.2–12.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.4–12.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.0%8.0–10.0
Loneliness among adults33.4%29.8–37.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.2–8.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–647.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)8.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)5.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle7.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription87.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate71.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households44.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+17.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age38.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$64,167$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$223,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,023$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.2 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 77.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured