Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

20895

in Kensington, MarylandPopulation 19,184

72.25/ 100

Ranked #240 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.8%)

Ranked #16 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (top 3.5%)

Ranked #36 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (top 11.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$173,625

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.2%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

24.6%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.6%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

4.5%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.1%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.3%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Kensington, Maryland (ZIP 20895), by its overall standing, sits in the top 0.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (240th) and the top 3.5% of Maryland (16th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: household income sits in the top 2.1% nationally, modeled transportation settles in the bottom 2.2% nationally, and modeled obesity registers in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability stands in the bottom 1.4% nationally, independent living disability lands in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and utility shutoff is in the bottom 4.4% nationally. Lead in tap water resides at the national minimum, and modeled food insecurity rests in the bottom 4.7% nationally. By contrast, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the top 4.5% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water sits at the national maximum.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 20814, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 99%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 99%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 83.0 ± 1.2 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.2%20.3–23.9
High blood pressure among adults30.7%28.4–32.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.3–9.8
Current asthma among adults9.1%8.2–10.1
Coronary heart disease among adults4.9%4.5–5.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
Depression among adults18.5%16.5–20.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.9%7.9–9.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.8%39.2–44.3
Obesity among adults24.6%21.6–27.5
Stroke among adults2.5%2.3–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.1%3.3–4.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%5.1–6.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.0%73.4–78.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.8%75.4–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults92.4%91.4–93.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.5%69.7–75.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults76.1%74.2–78.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.9%76.9–84.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%13.1–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults5.9%5.1–6.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults14.9%13.2–16.7
Short sleep duration among adults29.6%26.9–32.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.1%10.8–13.4
Frequent mental distress among adults11.2%10.1–12.4
Frequent physical distress among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.5
Any disability among adults19.6%17.7–21.6
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Independent living disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
Mobility disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
Self-care disability among adults2.2%2.0–2.4
Vision disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.1%16.0–20.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.3–8.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.9–5.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.1–7.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
Loneliness among adults29.5%26.8–32.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–644.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)74.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle6.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription92.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate78.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population17.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households42.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+18.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age41.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$173,625$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$781,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$2,113$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.0 yr ± 0.6378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.63 years of 83.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured