Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

22182

in Vienna, VirginiaPopulation 27,783

74.09/ 100

Ranked #83 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.3%)

Ranked #7 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 0.9%)

Ranked #13 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (top 4.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$205,108

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

2.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.1%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

21.3%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.2%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

3.8%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

5.8%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

73.3%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

4.4%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 22182, one of several in Vienna, Virginia, by its composite score, sits in the top 0.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (83rd) and the top 0.9% of Virginia (7th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: household income registers in the top 1.0% nationally, and dental providers settles in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity sits in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and obesity lies in the bottom 1.5% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the bottom 0.9% nationally, transportation resides in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and food insecurity is in the bottom 1.1% nationally. Physicians lands in the top 3.1% nationally, and modeled independent living disability stands in the bottom 0.8% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas registers in the top 3.6% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 22066, just across the boundary. The area further sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.1%19.8–24.6
High blood pressure among adults28.9%26.0–32.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.6–9.1
Current asthma among adults8.8%7.8–9.9
Coronary heart disease among adults4.8%4.3–5.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.6%3.2–4.1
Depression among adults18.1%15.8–20.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.7%8.5–11.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%35.7–42.6
Obesity among adults21.3%17.9–25.1
Stroke among adults2.3%2.1–2.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.4%3.5–5.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.5%3.9–5.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%74.6–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%76.3–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults91.1%90.0–92.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.7%66.1–73.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults78.4%76.1–80.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.8%76.8–86.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.9%11.8–16.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.4%5.4–7.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.0%13.7–18.6
Short sleep duration among adults31.8%28.5–35.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.0%9.6–12.6
Frequent mental distress among adults10.9%9.6–12.3
Frequent physical distress among adults9.1%8.1–10.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.9
Any disability among adults20.1%17.6–22.8
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Independent living disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Mobility disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.6
Self-care disability among adults1.9%1.7–2.1
Vision disability among adults2.7%2.5–3.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.8%16.4–21.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.0–6.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults3.5%2.9–4.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.4–6.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults3.8%3.3–4.3
Loneliness among adults30.3%26.7–34.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.2%2.8–3.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–643.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)2.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)82.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle3.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription99.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate71.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population31.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households50.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+17.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age42.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$205,108$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$1,125,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$2,590$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.0 yr ± 0.7378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.73 years of 84.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured