Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

20770

in Greenbelt, MarylandPopulation 28,384

57.39/ 100

Ranked #6,893 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #248 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranked #224 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transit access

11 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

5.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

3.3%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.1%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.4 mi

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.2%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.0%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Greenbelt, Maryland (ZIP 20770) lands in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,893rd) and the bottom 46% of Maryland (248th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: transit lies in the top 1.0% nationally, physicians stands in the top 1.1% nationally, and modeled hearing disability rests in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Lead in tap water registers at the national minimum. Distance to an emergency room resides at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Outpatient settles in the top 5.6% nationally. Set against that, modeled loud transportation noise is in the top 3.3% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk sits in the top 4.5% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site lands in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and modeled short sleep lies in the top 6.1% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. On the overall standing, ZIP 20705, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

4 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.6 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $84,096 predicts 79.4 years — 3.2 years above.

    Ranked #377 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.6 ± 1.6 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.6 years — 3.0 years above them.

    Ranked #800 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 23.6; chronic-disease standing 76.9 — 53 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,729 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 82.6 ± 1.6 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.3%20.6–24.2
High blood pressure among adults35.1%32.7–37.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.6–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults4.5%4.1–4.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Depression among adults16.5%14.7–18.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%11.2–13.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.1%31.6–36.5
Obesity among adults40.5%36.8–44.3
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.2%7.6–10.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.2%10.6–13.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.8%69.2–74.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.2%73.6–78.7
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%86.2–89.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%64.7–70.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.8%56.2–61.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.6%75.3–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.9%11.1–14.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.9%9.5–12.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.6%23.0–28.3
Short sleep duration among adults43.2%39.9–46.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.6%17.7–21.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%14.0–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.0%10.9–13.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%12.0–14.8
Any disability among adults26.1%23.7–28.6
Hearing disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
Independent living disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Mobility disability among adults12.3%11.0–13.6
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.9–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.3%23.5–29.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.7%20.2–25.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.0%14.9–19.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.9%17.7–22.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.7–12.3
Loneliness among adults36.7%33.3–40.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.9–14.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–6410.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)10.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)42.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle13.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription95.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)42.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate44.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population27.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households29.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+13.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age34.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$84,096$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$255,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$1,845$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.6 yr ± 0.8078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.80 years of 82.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured