Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

20905

in Silver Spring, MarylandPopulation 19,004

69.71/ 100

Ranked #639 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 2.0%)

Ranked #32 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (top 7.0%)

Ranked #68 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$159,740

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.2%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

25.9%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.4%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Park land

20.5%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.2%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.6%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST80th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

5.8%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 20905, one of several in Silver Spring, Maryland comes out in the top 2.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (639th) and the top 7.0% of Maryland (32nd).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: household income rests in the top 3.0% nationally, fiber broadband lies in the top 4.2% nationally, and lead in tap water sits at the national minimum. Modeled obesity settles in the bottom 7.0% nationally, modeled cognitive disability registers in the bottom 3.0% nationally, and park land stands in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lands in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and home broadband subscription is in the top 8.4% nationally. Fatal road crashes resides in the bottom 9.1% nationally, and modeled tooth loss rests in the bottom 4.1% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 20759, just across the boundary. This ZIP further sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.8 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $159,740 predicts 81.9 years — 1.9 years above.

    Ranked #1,001 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.7%20.9–24.5
High blood pressure among adults34.5%32.2–36.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.2–8.5
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.4–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
Depression among adults16.6%14.8–18.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%10.3–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.0%40.4–45.4
Obesity among adults25.9%23.0–28.9
Stroke among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.8%4.8–7.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%6.4–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.8–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.0%76.7–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults92.0%91.0–92.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.9%70.1–75.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.3%68.1–72.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.8%76.8–84.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.6%11.0–14.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.8%5.9–7.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.5%16.4–20.6
Short sleep duration among adults33.6%30.7–36.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.7%13.2–16.3
Frequent mental distress among adults11.7%10.5–12.9
Frequent physical distress among adults10.4%9.3–11.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.4%8.5–10.5
Any disability among adults22.0%19.9–24.1
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.8–5.9
Independent living disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Mobility disability among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.5–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.3%20.0–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.4–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.9–7.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.5–10.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.6%5.0–6.3
Loneliness among adults32.3%29.4–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–645.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)3.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)56.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)6.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription97.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate87.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population28.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households55.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+19.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age44.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$159,740$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$656,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$2,105$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.8 yr ± 0.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.76 years of 83.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured