Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

20689

in Sunderland, MarylandPopulation 1,809

62.53/ 100

Ranked #3,211 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.1%)

Ranked #137 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #6 of 38 Lexington Park, MD ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$161,833

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

10 µg/L

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.4%

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.52 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.0%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

61.5%

in the top 14.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

27.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US84th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.7%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US18th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Sunderland, Maryland (ZIP 20689), in overall standing, comes out in the top 10.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,211th) and the top 30% of Maryland (137th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: household income stands in the top 2.8% nationally, lithium in drinking water resides in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and poverty sits in the bottom 8.0% nationally. Childcare stands in the top 9.7% nationally, homeownership resides in the top 11.6% nationally, and modeled independent living disability sits in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability stands in the bottom 10.8% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 12.6% nationally. Modeled hearing disability sits in the bottom 12.1% nationally. Against that, fiber broadband stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 20736, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Lexington Park, MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%26.5–31.9
High blood pressure among adults39.9%36.7–43.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%4.9–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%4.9–6.6
Depression among adults18.1%15.7–20.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.0%10.4–13.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%35.3–41.9
Obesity among adults37.6%32.8–42.4
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.1%5.6–8.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.9%4.8–7.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.3–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%78.2–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults91.6%90.3–92.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.7%66.5–74.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.5%67.4–73.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.5%73.3–84.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.6–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.8%8.7–13.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.8%16.7–23.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.0%33.3–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.1%13.8–18.5
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.3–15.7
Frequent physical distress among adults11.9%10.4–13.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.1%9.6–12.6
Any disability among adults26.0%22.7–29.4
Hearing disability among adults5.6%4.9–6.3
Independent living disability among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Mobility disability among adults11.9%10.3–13.7
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.7–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%19.0–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.6–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.1–9.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.5–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.9–6.7
Loneliness among adults32.1%27.7–36.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.4–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–643.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)1.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle7.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription94.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate93.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population2.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households48.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+12.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age48.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$161,833$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$490,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.8 yr ± 1.6478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.64 years of 81.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured