Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11768

in Northport, New YorkPopulation 22,030

69.45/ 100

Ranked #690 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 2.2%)

Ranked #106 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 6.2%)

Ranked #222 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$172,570

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

25.9%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.0%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.3%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.7%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.5%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.2%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

98.3%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

98.3%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Northport, New York (ZIP 11768) places in the top 2.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (690th) and the top 6.2% of New York (106th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: household income resides in the top 2.1% nationally, and modeled loneliness is in the bottom 1.0% nationally. Modeled transportation lands in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and food insecurity stands in the bottom 2.0% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 2.3% nationally, cognitive disability settles in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and housing insecurity sits in the bottom 3.3% nationally. Fiber broadband lies in the top 4.8% nationally. On the other side, PFOA in drinking water rests in the top 4.6% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water resides in the top 5.0% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 11721, just across the boundary. Further still, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 43%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 62%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.1%23.8–28.5
High blood pressure among adults32.1%29.5–34.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%10.1–12.1
Current asthma among adults10.0%9.0–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
Depression among adults16.2%14.2–18.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.8%7.7–10.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.8%38.8–44.7
Obesity among adults26.8%23.4–30.2
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.0%4.9–7.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.3%2.8–3.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%77.1–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.8%81.6–85.8
Cholesterol screening among adults93.0%92.0–93.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.6%70.6–76.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.6%71.4–75.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.7%77.6–85.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.5–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.0%5.9–8.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.1%15.8–20.6
Short sleep duration among adults34.5%31.5–37.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.5%10.1–13.1
Frequent mental distress among adults12.4%11.1–13.9
Frequent physical distress among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.6
Any disability among adults22.3%19.8–24.9
Hearing disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.2
Independent living disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Mobility disability among adults10.2%8.9–11.5
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.1–2.6
Vision disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.6%16.2–21.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.3–7.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.9–5.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.0%3.5–4.6
Loneliness among adults25.9%22.6–29.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.7%3.1–4.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–641.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)1.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)63.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription95.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate93.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population5.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households53.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+23.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age48.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$172,570$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$801,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$2,379$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.5 yr ± 0.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.62 years of 82.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured