ZIP code
21156
in Upper Falls, MarylandPopulation 204
62.48/ 100
Ranked #3,237 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.1%)
Ranked #138 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (top 30%)
Ranked #70 of 157 Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD ZIPs (top 45%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Housing-cost burden
55.4%
in the top 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
4.6%
in the bottom 4.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST17thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Mammography
81.8%
in the top 4.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST79thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
4.5%
in the bottom 5.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 8.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS8thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Stroke
2.4%
in the bottom 5.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST8thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 8.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST8thUS8thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite measure, Upper Falls, Maryland (ZIP 21156) sits in the top 10.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,237th) and the top 30% of Maryland (138th).
Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: poverty rests at the national minimum, homeownership sits at the national maximum, and home broadband subscription registers at the national maximum. Modeled hearing disability lands in the bottom 4.0% nationally, and mammography resides in the top 4.4% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled coronary heart disease settles in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss is in the bottom 8.2% nationally. On the other hand, housing-cost burden rests in the top 1.8% nationally.
Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 21162, about 0.4 miles away, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 84%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 85%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 72%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 86%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 88%
11%
Disability
healthier than 93%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 71%
5%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 30%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 34%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 81%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 66%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 62%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 62%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 77%
11%
Disability
healthier than 82%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 87%
5%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 8%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 26%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 76%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 85%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 73%
11%
Disability
healthier than 71%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 84%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 49%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 52%
13%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 11%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 25%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
21087
Marylandshares a border
Score 62.30
Closest healthier
21162
Marylandabout 0.4 mi away
Score 63.08
Similar health profile
49426
Michigan99% similar profile
Score 64.10
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 26.0% | 23.7–28.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 28.9% | 26.3–31.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.5% | 7.7–9.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.7% | 10.5–13.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 4.5% | 3.8–5.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.5% | 4.3–6.9 |
| Depression among adults | 25.9% | 23.2–28.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 8.9% | 7.6–10.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 36.0% | 33.6–38.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 30.0% | 26.3–33.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.4% | 2.1–2.9 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 7.3% | 5.9–8.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 5.5% | 4.0–7.4 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 74.9% | 72.2–77.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 78.8% | 76.4–81.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 89.8% | 87.8–91.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 69.7% | 66.5–72.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 69.6% | 67.3–71.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 81.8% | 77.5–85.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.6% | 13.7–17.7 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 9.7% | 7.0–12.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 20.1% | 16.3–24.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 32.8% | 29.8–36.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 13.6% | 10.9–16.5 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.1% | 14.8–19.6 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 10.7% | 9.0–12.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 12.0% | 9.8–14.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 22.1% | 18.6–25.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.6% | 4.0–5.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.1% | 4.9–7.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 9.4% | 7.6–11.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.5% | 2.0–3.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.0% | 2.5–3.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 20.7% | 17.7–24.2 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.0% | 6.4–12.1 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 6.3% | 4.3–8.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.6% | 6.5–10.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.4% | 4.3–6.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.6% | 30.0–37.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.0% | 3.9–6.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MD median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 6.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 4.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 66.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 37.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 55.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 82.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 6.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464 |
| Single-parent households | 29.8% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 50.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464 |
| Median age | 37.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419 |
| Median home value | $793,800 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MD median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.5 yr ± 2.36 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 79.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.36 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured