Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

14130

in Pike, New YorkPopulation 70

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

50.23/ 100

Ranked #15,926 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranked #1,421 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

46.9%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

27.8%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

75.3%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.2%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

46.3%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.0%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

Pike, New York (ZIP 14130), by its overall standing, sits in the top 50% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,926th) and the bottom 18% of New York (1,421st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled expected annual loss resides in the bottom 1.7% nationally, modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and home broadband subscription lies at the national maximum. Modeled colon screening sits in the top 2.6% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 5.0% nationally. Unemployment registers at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 7.9% nationally. By contrast, modeled high cholesterol is in the top 1.6% nationally, and arsenic resides in the top 3.7% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 14024, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.04%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.6%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.0%35.5–44.7
High blood pressure among adults46.3%41.3–51.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.4%11.9–15.1
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.3–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults10.0%8.5–11.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.9%9.1–15.3
Depression among adults21.1%17.7–24.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.6%13.1–18.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.9%42.2–51.9
Obesity among adults37.5%29.6–46.6
Stroke among adults5.1%4.2–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.0–12.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.6%4.0–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.6%81.9–87.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults85.9%83.2–88.6
Cholesterol screening among adults93.1%91.7–94.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years75.3%70.7–79.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.7%55.9–63.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%68.0–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%10.0–15.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.6%12.4–20.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.0%23.7–37.0
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%31.1–44.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.9%17.3–27.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.0–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults17.5%14.5–21.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%10.2–15.3
Any disability among adults33.3%27.6–39.9
Hearing disability among adults8.7%7.4–10.2
Independent living disability among adults9.2%7.4–11.5
Mobility disability among adults19.8%15.7–24.7
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.0–6.5
Vision disability among adults5.7%4.5–7.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.0%17.5–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.7%9.9–18.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.7%9.7–18.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%7.7–12.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.5–8.6
Loneliness among adults29.8%24.3–35.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.0–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate74.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households26.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+12.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age29.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$70,114$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$97,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent—$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.8 yr ± 1.5978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.59 years of 80.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured