Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14807

in Arkport, New YorkPopulation 2,681

54.32/ 100

Ranked #10,287 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #1,111 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.71 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.57%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.5%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.5 pCi/L

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Arkport, New York (ZIP 14807) ranks in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,287th) and the bottom 36% of New York (1,111th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: grocery sits in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 10.8% nationally, modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 13.4% nationally, and fatal road crashes registers in the bottom 13.7% nationally. Modeled humid heat rests in the bottom 17% nationally, and uninsured stands in the bottom 10.0% nationally. On the other side, recreation lies at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Slow internet speeds lands in the top 18% nationally. Physicians sits at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, grocery runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 14804, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.3%29.5–35.3
High blood pressure among adults36.6%33.4–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.7–11.5
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.1–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.8–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Depression among adults21.3%18.6–24.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%10.2–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.8%36.3–43.5
Obesity among adults34.8%29.4–40.9
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.8%10.8–14.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.5–6.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%77.1–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%79.0–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults90.0%88.7–91.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.1%61.0–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.1%61.0–66.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.5%71.7–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.8–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.4%12.5–16.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.5%22.1–29.5
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%31.9–41.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.6%15.6–19.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.4–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%13.1–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%11.5–14.4
Any disability among adults29.6%26.3–33.2
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.4–7.8
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Mobility disability among adults15.1%13.4–17.1
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.9–26.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.3–14.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.6–13.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.1–12.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%6.0–7.8
Loneliness among adults30.5%26.5–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–645.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)9.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle6.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription88.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate89.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population0.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households51.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+19.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age42.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$64,408$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$128,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$868$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 1.0978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured